This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Albert G. Mumma was part of a 75-man force from the Alsos Mission and 30 Assault Unit that captured the 150,000-man garrison of Kiel during World War II?
"His younger brother George graduated with the class of 1934, but resigned later that year. He later became a major in the Army during World War II." -- The second "he" here is unclear as to whether you're referring to the subject of this article or to his brother.
"Mumma's class at Annapolis were the first one..." -- "class" in this context refers to the singular body as a whole, so his class was the first. Alternatively, you could state, "The cadets in Mumma's class at Annapolis were the first ones..."
Changed to "was". Hawkeye7 (talk) 17:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"He reported to his next ship, which was the cruiser USS Chicago (CA-29)..." this is the only ship in the article with a visible hull symbol. Should be standardized.
Article is illustrated by one image with appropriate licensing. No problems with stability are apparent, though a majority of the footnotes are sourced to what appear to be primary sources, which might present an issue at any future A or FA review.
I was not intending to take it to A or FAC for this reason. Hawkeye7 (talk) 17:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
On hold pending fixes. —Ed!(talk) 16:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Very good. Passing the article for GA, well done. —Ed!(talk) 21:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
