This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
This page is highly one sided. We absolutely need to include the harm/inefficiencies of Prohibition. But, this sounds like something from the Cato Institute.JoelWhy (talk) 22:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't it be something more like Consumption of alcohol during and after prohibition? It's a little long but maybe something that describes the concept a little better. Leefkrust22 (talk) 21:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article should be merged to the main article Prohibition in the United States. There could definitely be detailed articles on the subjection of Prohibition, but this one deals with a rather random selection of facts under a somewhat strange title. I don't see much use of it as a stand-alone article. Tomas e (talk) 18:42, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
