Talk:Alexandra Burke/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 17:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- You've only ever made one edit to this article, how can you nominate it without having improved it at all? Lots of sections are un-sourced, unreliably sourced, are dead links and and have completely unformatted references. No conscious effort has been made to improve this article on your part. If you nominated expecting a reviewer to list every single problem, which at the moment is endless, in order to make it at a GA without you having to really do anything, then you are wrong. Nominate it for a peer review and make it look like you actually care about improving this article. Quick failing due to no conscious effort to improve. The article hasn't changed before or after nomination. AARON• TALK 13:28, 4 November 2012 (UTC)