Jump to content

Talk:Alexey Pivovarov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <replace these words with your reason>. — RussianLiberal (talk) 11:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CREATIVE for guidelines on notability of journalists. Nobody Ent 12:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree with Boing, calling other editors wikifreaks just because they have different opinion is inappropriate. On the other hand, from what I've found in the news archives Pivovarov seems to be a notable journalist and an important exponent of the 2011 Russian anti-government protests. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you!!--RussianLiberal (talk) 13:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I'm leaning towards thinking he's sufficiently notable too. But I wouldn't remove the notability tag just yet, as there's no harm giving it time for more people to have a look. The worst that will happen is that someone will take it to AfD (which anyone can do anyway, even without that tag), and we'd all get to have our say there - it's certainly not going to be summarily deleted now -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    BBC and Reuters call Pivovarov "a leading Russian TV presenter" and "a hard core NTV veteran", which is in my opinion a good and persuasive evidence of notability. Not to mention the Russian coverage provided in the G-news search linked above. This is a clear case, the article has potential, at least in my opinion. No problem with the tag, I've learned to ignore most of that stuff. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've removed the notability tag - as the evening news reader for a major Russion television channel, he'd probably pass WP:GNG anyway, but the incident reported by Reuters -- where he reportedly refused yo read the news unless he could report on the ongoing protests -- really pushes him over the bar. For those who disagree, AfD is available. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your excellent improvements, Beyond My Ken. It is now a good and comprehensible piece of information on journalism in Russia. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 22:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, same from me - I agree, and thanks for your work -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to help out! Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pivovarov1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Pivovarov1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alexey Pivovarov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]