Talk:Alfred D. Robinson and Marion James Robinson

Alfred D. Robinson and Marion James Robinson has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 12, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

San Diego Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject San Diego To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner.
Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego
Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles.
Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article.
Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California geography stubs.
Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get San Diego into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

Horticulture and Gardening Low‑importance

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alfred D. Robinson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AmaryllisGardener (talk · contribs) 15:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Notes[edit]

I don't know about having the article be about the couple, but the article title only having the man's name, could we move it to something like "Alfred D. Robinson and Marion James Robinson"? Otherwise it's good, but I'd like to have this resolved before I pass it. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 15:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I realize this is kind of a strange approach to the article - neither fish nor fowl, as it were. It was the product of a discussion here, Talk:Rosecroft (San Diego)#Separate article?, about how to create the article. Basically our conclusion was that they should not have separate articles, because their stories overlap so much, and also because there is less documentation about Marion's notability than there is about Alfred's. She was a woman of her time, and in husband-wife partnerships like this, the husband tended to get all the credit and publicity. I think your "Alfred and Marion" suggestion is be a good one. And of course, both Alfred and Marion will redirect to it. Shall I go ahead and move it? --MelanieN (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be good. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 20:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I think I might also do the same with the other article I set up this way, Fred Urquhart. --MelanieN (talk) 05:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MelanieN: You caught me seconds before turning my laptop off! Passed! :) --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 05:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and sorry for the delay! I was surprised to see a "failed" notice on my talk page! --MelanieN (talk) 05:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I don't know what happened with Legobot, earlier with Jim Carter's GA it notified Example instead of him, bots do crazy things. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 05:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]