Talk:Algarve Cup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Can someone put the 2007 info? I tried, but couldn't get the formatting working.Please check out www.firstgiving.com/douglasawh (until March 20th 2007). The event benefits the kids at www.hoop-dreams.net! 04:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Are semifinals played?[edit]

It seems to me that (at least in 2007) there are no semifinals but the winners of A and B groups (Denmark and USA) go straight to the final match.

http://www.ussoccer.com/common/stContent.jsp_26-2007AlgarveCup.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.197.255.6 (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Why not brazil?[edit]

Does anyone know, wha Brazil never attends? 130.149.52.33 (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, they've never been invited - http://ajw.asahi.com/article/sports/soccer/AJ201203170038 18:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Algarve Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

overall table is needed[edit]

National_team_appearances_in_the_FIFA_World_Cup#Overall_team_records please dont delete overall table. for fifa because of importance create new page for overall table, but Algarve Cup ( minor tournament ) isnt need to independent article , also this article isnt very long. not delete useful table that waste over 4 hours of my time. this policy Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information isnt clear and this table not violate laws. you can see it: UEFA_Women's_Championship#General_Statistics,National team appearances in the FIFA Women's World Cup. if you think this table is Unnecessary , creat a new article for table. thanks. (this table complete article , all of policy isnt law, many of them is Recommendation and this table is usefull and relate andvery important, with delete it article is incomplete), thanks.Callofworld (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Callofworld: I boldly reverted your edit because i considered the addition of another giant table is turning the article into a statistics compendium, which is not what Wikipedia is for (under WP:NOTSTATS). I feel there is an element of frustration that this single edit took so much of your time, but that in itself is not a reason for the table's noteworthiness. Such a table for FIFA world cups (Men/Women) may be warranted due to the high importance of the event, but not for every minor tournament. Do other editors feel this table is warranted, or sets a precedence for every minor tournament to have this level of statistical detail ? Matilda Maniac (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Matilda Maniac: it is your Personal impressions from (under WP:NOTSTATS), this policy isnt Necessary for all articles, Nature of sport event article have a many statistics, it isnt statistics compendium, this table is The most important part of this article. Algarve Cup isnt minor tournament or every tournament, Algarve Cup after world cup and olymipcs is third important tournament of womens football. because number of teams in table (35) is big you think very long. dont delete table . if you think is long , first create a seperate page and transfer to it. yes it is need for complete , and Algarve Cup isnt minor but minor than world cup but it is important. your personal taste not apply here. if your idea about WP:NOTSTATS is correct, all of table of articles Had been removed.

you first create National team appearances in the Algarve Cup , so delete table.

Italy women's national football team - :@Matilda Maniac: this article and all of article like it is statistics compendium. delete all of them? pls dont enter Personal impressions. thanks.Callofworld (talk) 05:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will back off here, and not press the issue with this tournament, however, I note that you have just made a similar statistical compilation for another minor tournament - Cyprus Cup. 12:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
And more and more minor tournaments : OFC Beach Soccer Championship, Peace Queen Cup, Women's Nordic Football Championship, Africa Beach Soccer Cup of Nations, Nordic Football Championship, Africa Women Cup of Nations, Copa América Femenina, and more. Wow ! Matilda Maniac (talk) 13:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

help me to creat National team appearances in the Algarve Cup and National team appearances in the Cyprus Cup, many article relate to football have a general statistics , many minor or continental championship.Callofworld (talk) 14:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC) i was have (thanks) from other users dor edit in overall results and you not like it!Callofworld (talk) 14:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC) this policy : WP:NOTSTATS :Not specify exactly (each section with Personal Impression and Personal Taste can be deleted) , for improve information and complete overall table is good.Callofworld (talk) 14:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC) Africa men Cup of Nations have a General Statistics, why not Africa Women Cup of Nations? for policy ? or Personal Impression of policy? we can delete all of table from all of article and wiki become incomplete! is it mission of wikipedia?[reply]

wiki policy say : the statistics can be split into a separate article and summarized in the main article[edit]

Hi , first Algrave and other article is a important official championship and very important for each Continent. Overall results is more important than Participating nations! many article have it. we can transfer it to : National team appearances in the ....... Cup. thanks. this policy : WP:NOTSTATS :Not specify exactly (each section with Personal Impression and Personal Taste can be deleted) , for improve information and complete overall table is good.Callofworld (talk) 14:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Excessive listings of unexplained statistics. Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing; accordingly, statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability, and articles with statistics should include explanatory text providing context. Where statistics are so lengthy as to impede the readability of the article, the statistics can be split into a separate article and summarized in the main article. (e.g., statistics from the main article United States presidential election, 2012 have been moved to a related article Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2012).


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Algarve Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]