Talk:All in the Family (Body of Proof)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAll in the Family (Body of Proof) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 4, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 20, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Body of Proof episode "All in the Family" featured flashbacks to when the title character, Megan Hunt (Dana Delany) was younger, played by child actress Madeline Milne?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:All in the Family (Body of Proof)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 16:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Picture: You note that the facial expressions were praised by critics, but nowhere in the article does it expand upon this. Yes it does - Reception.  Done
  • Intro: "death at his home by" Maybe change 'home' to 'house', since you just said the word 'home'. Same thing in the plot section  Done
  • Plot: "The attack on Ed was personal and after Detective Samantha Baker (Sonja Sohn) finds evidence to suggest Mike did kill his father, such as negative emails about his father." This sentence is fragments. Please reword, maybe to "Detective Samantha Baker (Sonja Sohn) concludes that the attack on Ed was personal after she finds evidence to suggest Mike did indeed kill his father, such as negative emails."  Done
  • Plot: "he's" -> "he is" no contractions  Done?
  • Plot: "Curtis explains to Todd that Manny is a juvenile; but he won’t be able to be released back to his former home, as he is being abused there." -> "Curtis explains to Todd that Manny is a juvenile, but he will not be able to be released back to his former home, as he is being abused there."  Done
  • Plot: You don't need to cite the episode for the plot, as its assumed the episode is a generic reference for the entire page. - See Letting Go Review.  Not done
  • Reception: "Among viewers between ages 18 and 49, it received a 2.0 rating/9 share; a share represents the percentage of households using a television at the time the program is airing." -> "Among viewers between ages 18 and 49, it received a 2.0 rating/9 share. This means that it was seen by 2 percent of all 18- to 49-year-olds, and 9 percent of all 18- to 49-year-olds watching television at the time of the broadcast."  Done
  • Reception: When you said "Of the… scene", I'd say, "Writing about the X scene, he/she noted…" {[done}}
  • References: add writer and director for Ref 1, 4-6  Not done
  • References: Use consistent dating methods…  Done

That's it. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC) - Finished - Thanks! — M.Mario (T/C) 17:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although, I still don't like the episode citing the episode, I will let it slide and pass.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on All in the Family (Body of Proof). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]