Jump to content

Talk:All the Best Cowboys Have Daddy Issues/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 20:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will get to the review this weekend. Ruby 2010/2013 20:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments[edit]

  • ...eleventh episode of the first season of Lost. -> eleventh episode of the first season of ABC television series Lost
  • Wikilink passenger manifest in lead and plot
  • The flashbacks were inspired by the writer's background as the son of a doctor,... I assume "the writer" is referring to Javier Grillo-Marxuach? Perhaps change and use his last name?
  • With Jack and Kate's journey, in the original outline they were to come under a dart attack by the Others, the island's native inhabitants, however it was cut because executive producer Damon Lindelof deemed the attack too "cheezy." A bit of a long sentence there. Also wanted to confirm if "cheezy" was what Lindelof meant. Ruby 2010/2013 05:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Three reviews is a little low. Are there one or two more you could add in here?
  • I found another one, but apparently there was some spam filter when I tried to save the changes after adding a review from Examiner.com. -- Matthew RD 01:23, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good mix of online sources and the DVD special features. There isn't too much else the article needs, so I'll place the review on hold for seven days. Nice work on a good episode of Lost, Ruby 2010/2013 05:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing, I believe I have addressed the issues. -- Matthew RD 01:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Happy to pass this one. Nice work, Ruby 2010/2013 01:45, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]