Talk:Alone Again Or
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alone Again Or article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Damned AloneAgainOr.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Damned AloneAgainOr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Damned AloneAgainOr.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Damned AloneAgainOr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Psychedelic pop?
[edit]How is this a psychedelic pop song? Foreverchanges1167 (talk) 11:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Comments below copied from my talk page (Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:27, 13 June 2020 (UTC)):
Dear @Ghmyrtle: I know Prokofiev's great Lt Kijé by heart for many many years. I love the wonderful Alone Again Or since it came out, way back in the sixties. I certainly admire Barney Hoskyns, who once published a wonderful book on The Band. However, I cannot imagine how Hoskyns in his right mind would say that the song's melody "drew loosely on Sergei Prokofiev's Lieutenant Kije Suite". You tell me "it's in the source". Did it occur to you that not all sources can be trusted? Do you know this music at all, did you ever compare the song and the suite? Did you notice that the song and Prokofiev's music are not even "loosely" connected? Hoskyns obviously didn't, he must have heard a remark that someone else once made and that does not belong in an encyclopedia. Well, please start rightaway and listen... and you will agree with me that I even don't have to prove my point, won't you? The obvious truth is in the music itself. Hartenhof (talk) 22:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Well, the problem is that Hoskyns' book is a reliable source, and - so far as I know - you are not (but correct me if I'm wrong). What Hoskyns says is: "A brilliantly disingenuous ode to melancholy, the song was inspired by Bryan's memory of waiting for a girlfriend and based on Prokofiev's Lieutenant Kijé Suite..." Now, Hoskyns may or may not have made a mistake, but the fact remains that that is what he has written. I don't have any expertise or knowledge in relation to Prokofiev so I can't comment.
Anyway, rather than discussing it here, you need to make your argument on the article talk page so that other editors can contribute. I'll copy this exchange over there.Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)- @Ghmyrtle: I know the definition of a reliable source. I don't suggest that a finding of my own should be included in the article. I am just asking to remove a doubtful, unspecified and undocumented remark, made by an author who's book may be a reliable source in many respects, but not in this one. Hartenhof (talk) 03:59, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- I think it would be best to rewrite the sentence as follows: "The song was inspired by his memory of waiting for a girlfriend. One commentator suggests that it was based on a theme from Sergei Prokofiev's music for Lieutenant Kije. (+ ref) Hartenhof (talk) 07:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK, I've now qualified the statement. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:54, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, it seems ok to me now. I am still curious about what part of Lt Kijé Hoskyns actually means. Prokofiev's orchestral suite has 5 movements (approx. 20 mins.) and was derived from the even longer film score that he composed in 1934. I'm playing it now, and no Alone Again Or whatsoever. Or? ;-) Hartenhof (talk) 09:18, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK, I've now qualified the statement. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:54, 14 June 2020 (UTC)