Talk:Alstroemeriaceae
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The linked photo is not a Bomarea, but most likely a Tropaeolum species. MrDarwin 03:07, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Changed to a different pic - MPF 15:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Schickendantziella is not a genus in Alstreomeriaceae but in Alliaceae...109.59.217.30 (talk) 16:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Alstroemeriaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060424061916/http://delta-intkey.com/angio/www/alstroem.htm to http://delta-intkey.com/angio/www/Alstroem.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070103200438/http://delta-intkey.com/angio/ to http://delta-intkey.com/angio/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Luzuriaga[edit]
What is the basis for including Luzuriaga in the Alstroemeriaceae? The one reference cited (Hofreiter) places it in its own family, Luzuriagaceae. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 20:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Also, I can find no publication of the name "Luzuriageae". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 20:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)