Jump to content

Talk:Amazon HQ2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAmazon HQ2 has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 16, 2019Good article nomineeListed
September 3, 2019Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

List of bids

[edit]

SounderBruce 23:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Submitted and announced

[edit]

Why is there a submitted and announced section? I will delete the announced section. If anyone disagrees please revert. 174.95.7.223 (talk) 04:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are several cities who announced their intention to bid, but did not submit by the deadline. The section needs to be cleaned up, but not deleted wholesale. SounderBruce 04:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Is having an intention to submit a proposal but not following through notable? Seems like it just adds clutter to the article. 174.95.7.223 (talk) 05:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also most of the cities are just duplicates from the submitted list. If no one wants to improve the list or debate why it should remain, I think we should remove it. 174.95.7.223 (talk) 22:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Moving sources from the Announced section to the Bid entries is not appropriate. Neither is trying to go around the BRD process and revert without further discussion. SounderBruce 03:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well then contribute to the discussion and article instead of staying quiet and just annoyingly reverting progress of the article. Also, please read WP:OWNERSHIP. It would be beneficial to you. 174.95.7.223 (talk) 16:17, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting content and mis-using references is not progress. SounderBruce 00:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The "content" is repeated in the section above and therefor utterly useless. The moving references to a more appropriate section is not "mis-using" them. 174.95.7.223 (talk) 01:37, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You cannot use references announcing a bid being considered and use them to verify that a bid has been submitted. They are two different, distinct events that require different references. SounderBruce 01:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not all references are announcing a bid. They speak of the actual bid. 174.95.7.223 (talk) 15:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep list of bidders?

[edit]

While there needs to be a mention that 238 cities that made a bid, should most of these cities be listed on this page? It seems like cruft to include all of those cities in a long list.

The 20 finalists need to remain since that it is notable to be on the shortlist. --Frmorrison (talk) 19:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, seems like unnecessary listcruft to me. There's no long standing interest in the 238 places that bid for it, in 5 years people will care about where the HQ is, not who tried to bid for it. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. Looking at the list of criteria for listcruft, I don't see how keeping the list of cities meets any of them. It's a finite list, verifiable using reliable surces, requires no active maintenance, and is clearly relevant to the topic. I'm not sure why we're trying to guess at what people might find interesting in five years. By way of comparison: if you go on election-related pages like Results by riding of the Canadian federal election, 2011, you'll see all the candidates. (Holding off restoring the content pending resolution of this discussion). Tompw (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Before I deleted it, there were perhaps 150 cities listed. I think all 238 bidders should be listed or list non of them (with the existing references for a reader to find the entire list elsewhere). --Frmorrison (talk) 02:06, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll work to get the full list together. The section below is from the edit history. I'll add things hear until its complete (or nearly complete). Tompw (talk) 16:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Useful list: [1] Tompw (talk) 13:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
List of submitted bids, removed in August 2018

Submitted

[edit]

As of October 23, 2017, 238 proposals had been submitted and received by Amazon, representing cities and regions from 54 states, provinces, districts, and territories.[1][2][3] The only U.S. states that did not have a locality that submitted a formal proposal were Arkansas, Hawaii, Iowa, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming.[4] The Canadian provinces of New Brunswick and Saskatchewan also declined to bid, along with the Yukon Territory.[5]

References

  1. ^ Bomey, Nathan (October 19, 2017). "See the cities hoping to land 50,000 Amazon jobs, headquarters". USA Today. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  2. ^ "Amazon HQ2". Amazon.com. October 2017. Retrieved October 23, 2017.
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference SeattleTimes-118 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ "Amazon says it received 238 proposals for 2nd headquarters". Las Vegas Sun. Associated Press. October 23, 2017.
  5. ^ Wingfield, Nick (October 23, 2017). "Amazon Counts Its Suitors: 238 Want to Be Home for 2nd Headquarters". The New York Times. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  6. ^ a b c d Stevens, Laura (November 15, 2017). "We Have Stoplights! Implausible Towns Bid for Amazon Headquarters". Wall Street Journal. p. A1. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  7. ^ Anderson, Eric (October 19, 2017). "What Amazon in Albany might look like". Times Union. Albany, New York. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  8. ^ The pitch: 'Amazon Promenade' connecting downtown Albany and Rensselaer
  9. ^ Trubey, Scott; Bluestein, Greg (October 19, 2017). "Georgia delivers its bid for Amazon HQ2". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  10. ^ As Atlanta competes for Amazon's HQ2, Deloitte ranks Atlanta #2 in supply-chain
  11. ^ Bergeron, Tom (October 19, 2017). "Six other N.J. municipalities submit bids for Amazon HQ2". ROI. Retrieved February 2, 2018.
  12. ^ Herrera, Sebastian (October 18, 2017). "Austin makes its bid for Amazon's giant HQ2 project". Austin American-Statesman. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  13. ^ Romero, Ezra David (October 19, 2017). "Fresno, Bakersfield Place Bids For Amazon HQ2". Fresno, California: Valley Public Radio. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  14. ^ Boulden, Jim (October 18, 2017). "Baltimore is trying to land Amazon's new HQ with help from Goldman Sachs". CNN Money. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  15. ^ Broadwater, Luke (October 19, 2017). "Baltimore's Old Goucher neighborhood makes independent bid for Amazon headquarters". Baltimore Sun. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  16. ^ Romero, Melissa (October 19, 2017). "Here are all the cities near Philly vying for Amazon's new HQ". Curbed. Retrieved February 2, 2018.
  17. ^ "Birmingham submits 'great road map' for Amazon HQ2". October 18, 2017. Retrieved November 3, 2017.
  18. ^ "Central Alabama mayors show support for Birmingham's Amazon HQ2 bid". Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  19. ^ "Huntsville to submit bid for Amazon HQ2". Birmingham Business Journal. Retrieved October 6, 2017.
  20. ^ Russell, Betsy Z. (October 26, 2017). "Amazon received HQ2 submission from Idaho". Spokesman-Review. Spokane, Washington. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  21. ^ Logan, Tim; Chesto, Jon (October 20, 2017). "Boston submits its bid for Amazon, aiming for 50,000 jobs and a transformation". The Boston Globe. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  22. ^ a b Singer, Stephen (October 19, 2017). "Connecticut Makes Pitch For Amazon HQ As Malloy Downplays Fiscal Woes". Hartford Courant. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  23. ^ Adelman, Jacob (October 19, 2017). "Add Bristol Township to the list of Philly neighbors vying for Amazon's HQ2". Philly.com. Retrieved February 2, 2018.
  24. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n DeCosta-Klipa, Nik (October 20, 2017). "What we know about New England's Amazon bids". Boston.com. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  25. ^ a b Robinson, David; Precious, Tom (October 19, 2017). "Buffalo-Rochester bid for Amazon among 4 from New York". The Buffalo News. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  26. ^ "'We'd fight a bear for you,' Calgary tells Amazon in what Nenshi deems a 'top-notch pitch' for HQ2". CBC News. October 19, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  27. ^ "Camden to make its own play for new Amazon HQ". Philly Voice. September 12, 2017.
  28. ^ Peralta, Katherine and Portillo, Ely (October 19, 2017). "What's next for Charlotte's Amazon HQ bid". Charlotte Observer. Retrieved October 21, 2017.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  29. ^ Ori, Ryan (October 16, 2017). "Chicago and Illinois submit bid for Amazon's HQ2". The Chicago Tribune. Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  30. ^ Ori, Ryan; Zumbach, Lauren (September 7, 2017). "Chicago will bid for Amazon's second headquarters — and its 50,000 jobs". The Chicago Tribune. Retrieved September 20, 2017.
  31. ^ "Welcome Home Amazon". City of Chula Vista. Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  32. ^ "Cincinnati, NKY, Dayton will bid jointly on Amazon's HQ2". Cincinnati Business Journal. Retrieved November 4, 2017.
  33. ^ TEGNA. "Cleveland to bid on Amazon headquarters site". Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  34. ^ Dinsmore, Christopher (September 11, 2017). "University of Maryland suggests College Park as site for new Amazon HQ". Baltimore Sun. Retrieved January 4, 2018.
  35. ^ Rouan, Rick (October 19, 2017). "Documents detail Columbus' bid to lure Amazon's 2nd HQ". Columbus Dispatch. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  36. ^ Bergeron, Kelly (April 23, 2018). "Cornwall's Amazon HQ2 bid won't, by itself, lure the tech sector to our city". Standard-Freeholder. Retrieved October 27, 2017.
  37. ^ Hethcock, Bill (October 19, 2017). "DFW has officially submitted its bid for Amazon's HQ2". Dallas Business Journal. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  38. ^ Blair, Russell (October 18, 2017). "Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton Sends Amazon Key To The City". Hartford Courant. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  39. ^ "Danbury making formal bid for Amazon HQ". NewsTimes.com. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  40. ^ Romero, Melissa (October 19, 2017). "Here are all the cities near Philly vying for Amazon's new HQ". Curbed. Retrieved February 2, 2018.
  41. ^ Chuang, Tamara (October 18, 2017). "No bribes or cities named 'Amazon': Colorado's pitch to get the next headquarters touts incentives that could exceed $100M". The Denver Post. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  42. ^ ALDO SVALDI (September 21, 2017). "Colorado expects to provide Amazon with a single proposal for new campus". The Denver Post.
  43. ^ Livengood, Chad. "Detroit-Windsor Pitch to Amazon: 'We're One Community'". Crain's Detroit Business. Crain Communications, Inc. Retrieved November 2, 2017.
  44. ^ "The quest for Amazon HQ2: Detroit-Windsor bid could be attractive".
  45. ^ Mertz, Emily (October 19, 2017). "Edmonton submits proposal to house new Amazon headquarters". Global News. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  46. ^ Kolenc, Vic (October 20, 2017). "Officials reveal little about El Paso region's Amazon HQ2 bid". El Paso Times. Retrieved October 25, 2017.
  47. ^ "El Paso region to compete for Amazon's second headquarters". El Paso Times. Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  48. ^ "Enfield going forward with Amazon bid". MassLive.com. Advance Publications. October 19, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  49. ^ Arsenault, Mark; Nanos, Janelle (October 21, 2017). "In Enfield, Conn., a bid for Amazon tinged with irony". Boston Globe. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  50. ^ Sheehan, Tim (October 19, 2017). "Fresno offers long-shot bid for Amazon's 50,000-employee HQ2". Fresno Bee. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  51. ^ "Gary, Indiana wants the next Amazon headquarters". Retrieved September 30, 2017.
  52. ^ Gardner, Paula (October 20, 2017). "Grand Rapids 'very proud' of bid for Amazon headquarters". MLive. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  53. ^ Cromer, Brookley and Shaw, Amanda (October 20, 2017). "Greenville city, county officials put in bid for new Amazon headquarters". FOX Carolinas. Retrieved October 21, 2017.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  54. ^ Thomson, Aly (October 19, 2017). "Halifax submits bid for Amazon's 2nd North American headquarters". CBC News. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
  55. ^ "'Welcome to unstoppable,' Here's how Hamilton sold itself to Amazon". CBC Hamilton. November 1, 2017. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  56. ^ "Greater Hartford boldly pitches assets in Amazon HQ2 bid". Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  57. ^ Eaton, Collin (October 23, 2017). "Houston's Amazon bid turns on 'Innovation Corridor'". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  58. ^ a b Zint, Bradley (October 18, 2017). "Huntington Beach and Long Beach team up on a bid for Amazon's HQ2". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 23, 2017.
  59. ^ Martin, Ryan; Briggs, James (October 19, 2017). "Amazon HQ2: Central Indiana's bid for new headquarters is submitted". The Indianapolis Star. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  60. ^ Khouri, Andrew (October 19, 2017). "Irvine wants to put Amazon's second headquarters in the Spectrum". The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  61. ^ Wahid, Abdul. "Irvine Co. Making Serious Push for Amazon HQ2 | Orange County Business Journal". www.ocbj.com. Retrieved October 18, 2017. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  62. ^ Dixon, Drew (October 18, 2017). "Jacksonville submits formal bid to land second Amazon headquarters". The Florida Times-Union. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  63. ^ Bergeron, Tom (October 19, 2017). "Six other N.J. municipalities submit bids for Amazon HQ2". ROI. Retrieved February 2, 2018.
  64. ^ Vockrodt, Steve (October 19, 2017). "KC area's secret bid for Amazon HQ2 offers a few sites. Where could it go?". Kansas City Star. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  65. ^ "6 Wacky Ways Cities Are Trying to Win Amazon's New Headquarters". Retrieved October 18, 2017.
  66. ^ Bergeron, Tom (October 19, 2017). "Six other N.J. municipalities submit bids for Amazon HQ2". ROI. Retrieved February 2, 2018.
  67. ^ Whetstone, Tyler (October 18, 2017). "Local leaders sell Knoxville to Amazon: #ChooseKnox". Knoxville News Sentinel. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  68. ^ a b Eagland, Nick (October 20, 2017). "Langford submits bid for Amazon headquarters". The Vancouver Sun. Retrieved October 24, 2017.
  69. ^ Wagaman, Andrew (October 19, 2017). "What's the Lehigh Valley's Pitch for Amazon HQ2?". The Morning Call. Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  70. ^ "L.A. Officially Submits Bid to Become Home to Amazon's Second Headquarters". The Hollywood Reporter. October 19, 2017. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  71. ^ Shafer, Sheldon S. (October 18, 2017). "Louisville officials: Don't worry, there is a bid for the Amazon HQ2 project". The Courier-Journal. Louisville, Kentucky. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  72. ^ "Memphis Offers $10M in Incentives for Amazon HQ2". Retrieved October 3, 2017.
  73. ^ Barszewski, Larry. "South Florida wants to be Amazon.com's second home". Sun-Sentinel.com. Retrieved October 18, 2017.
  74. ^ Daykin, Tom (October 18, 2017). "Milwaukee area's long shot-bid to land Amazon headquarters plays on Chicago, Madison ties". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  75. ^ Erickson, Kurt (October 20, 2017). "Missouri banking on futuristic tube travel in bid for Amazon HQ2". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  76. ^ Henry, Sean (October 20, 2017). "Montreal submits bid to Amazon to become 2nd North American headquarters". CBC News. Retrieved December 12, 2017.
  77. ^ "Nashville ECD working with teams to identify potential locations for Amazon HQ2". Retrieved October 7, 2017.
  78. ^ Levitt, David M. (October 16, 2017). "Christie Backs Newark's Amazon Bid With $7 Billion in Tax Breaks". Bloomberg News. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  79. ^ "After Mars HQ decision, 10 reasons why Amazon should choose Newark as its HQ2". NJ.com. December 6, 2017. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  80. ^ Bergeron, Tom (October 19, 2017). "Six other N.J. municipalities submit bids for Amazon HQ2". ROI. Retrieved February 2, 2018.
  81. ^ Garofolo, Chris (October 17, 2017). "NH pitch for 50,000 Amazon jobs will likely focus on Londonderry site". New Hampshire Union Leader. Manchester, New Hampshire. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  82. ^ Bagli, Charles V. (October 16, 2017). "In Amazon Bid, New York Brags About, Well, Everything". The New York Times. Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  83. ^ Kashiwagi, Sydney (October 19, 2017). "Deadline day: Loudoun, Fairfax to submit joint bid for Amazon's second headquarters". Loudoun Times-Mirror. Retrieved October 21, 2017.
  84. ^ Davis, Brad (October 23, 2017). "A New Amazon Headquarters in Omaha?". Omaha World Herald. Retrieved December 6, 2017.
  85. ^ Lord, Craig (October 17, 2017). "Talent of two cities: Ottawa partners with Gatineau on Amazon HQ2 bid". Ottawa Business Journal. Retrieved November 24, 2017.
  86. ^ "Invest Ottawa's Amazon bid focuses on LeBreton Flats project — which isn't approved yet". Retrieved October 23, 2017.
  87. ^ Adelman, Jacob (October 19, 2017). "Philadelphia celebrates its bid for Amazon headquarters". Philly.com. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  88. ^ Belko, Mark (October 19, 2017). "Pittsburgh ships its bid — 2 inches thick — to Amazon". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  89. ^ "Pomona Partnership Submits Bid for Amazon Second HQ". Retrieved October 23, 2017.
  90. ^ Rodriguez, Monica. "Pomona, Cal Poly and Fairplex unite to submit bid for Amazon's second headquarters". Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Retrieved October 23, 2017.
  91. ^ Redden, Jim (October 19, 2017). "Amazon HQ chase: Region submits four offers". Portland Tribune. Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  92. ^ Rogoway, Mike (September 9, 2017). "Portland and Vancouver join bidding frenzy for Amazon's 'second headquarters'". The Oregonian. Retrieved September 20, 2017.
  93. ^ Redden, Jim (October 19, 2017). "Querétaro se visualiza como sede de Amazon" [Amazon HQ chase: Region submits four offers] (in Spanish). Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  94. ^ Athans, Elaina (October 19, 2017). "Leaders wait to learn whether Raleigh-Durham is Amazon's prime pick". WTVD-TV. Retrieved October 21, 2017.
  95. ^ "Rhode Island to Bid on 2nd Amazon Headquarters". U.S. News and World Report. September 7, 2017. Retrieved October 19, 2017.
  96. ^ Avellino, Kelly. "RVA makes big push for Amazon's second headquarters". Retrieved October 23, 2017.
  97. ^ Glover, Mark (October 18, 2017). "Sacramento area throws hat in the ring for Amazon's 'HQ2'". Sacramento Bee. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  98. ^ Lillis, Ryan (September 7, 2017). "Sacramento plans to bid for Amazon headquarters – and 50,000 jobs". Sacramento Bee. Retrieved September 20, 2017.
  99. ^ Raymond, Art (October 18, 2017). "Utah submits Amazon HQ2 bid amid community concerns". Deseret News. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  100. ^ Freeman, Mike (October 15, 2017). "San Diego's bid for Amazon HQ2: Can it win?". San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  101. ^ Lee, Daniel (September 7, 2017). "San Diego to bid for Amazon HQ2". San Diego Union Tribune. Retrieved September 25, 2017.
  102. ^ Thadani, Trisha (October 19, 2017). "Bay Area cities submit formal bid for second Amazon HQ as deadline looms". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  103. ^ Sciacca, Annie (October 19, 2017). "Bay Area cities join together in bid for Amazon headquarters". The Mercury-News. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  104. ^ Thadani, Trisha (September 7, 2017). "San Jose to bid for second Amazon.com headquarters". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved September 20, 2017.
  105. ^ Khouri, Andrew (October 18, 2017). "Southern California cities to submit bids for Amazon's new headquarters site". The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  106. ^ Gibbs, Jason (October 23, 2017). "Amazon headquarters bid includes binational community near Santa Teresa". Las Cruces Sun-News. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
  107. ^ Helwig, David (October 17, 2017). "Update on Sault's Amazon headquarters bid". SooToday.com. Retrieved October 18, 2017.
  108. ^ Cox, Brandon (October 20, 2017). "Scottsboro throws name in hat for Amazon's HQ2". The Daily Sentinel. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  109. ^ Day, Matt (October 20, 2017). "Seattle area's HQ2 bid tries to convince Amazon to stay at home". The Seattle Times. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  110. ^ Cornfield, Jerry (September 12, 2017). "Hey Amazon, Bothell is the place for your 2nd headquarters". The Everett Herald. Retrieved September 20, 2017.
  111. ^ Schlinkmann, Mark (October 18, 2017). "Cities race to the Amazon HQ2 finish line with various strategies". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  112. ^ Agogliati, Zymaris, Polansky, Michael, Eva, Rob. "Malloy outlines plan to lure Amazon to Connecticut". Retrieved October 19, 2017.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  113. ^ "Town wants Amazon's new HQ so much it plans to split off new town called 'Amazon'". The Register. Retrieved October 4, 2017.
  114. ^ Martin, Kate (September 11, 2017). "Tacoma ready to make bid for second Amazon headquarters". The News Tribune. Retrieved September 20, 2017.
  115. ^ Puente, Mark; Danielson, Richard (September 26, 2017). "Pinellas, Hillsborough join forces to enter Amazon bidding war". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved September 26, 2017.
  116. ^ "Toledo submits HQ2 proposal to Amazon". Retrieved October 16, 2017.
  117. ^ Boisvert, Nick (October 19, 2017). "'We are now and tomorrow': Toronto makes its pitch for Amazon's HQ2". CBC News. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  118. ^ Bergeron, Tom (October 19, 2017). "Six other N.J. municipalities submit bids for Amazon HQ2". ROI. Retrieved February 2, 2018.
  119. ^ "Tulalip also branches out on its own to try to land Amazon". Marysville Globe. October 20, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  120. ^ Schlosser, Kurt (September 14, 2017). "Tucson sends a 21-foot-tall cactus to Jeff Bezos with a message: Amazon can grow in Arizona". geekwire. Retrieved February 9, 2018.
  121. ^ World, Kevin Canfield Tulsa. "Mayor believes Tulsa's proposal for Amazon HQ2 will leave company 'impressed and surprised'". Tulsa World. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  122. ^ Lazatin, Emily (October 19, 2017). "Vancouver's bid to house Amazon's second headquarters given green light". Global News. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  123. ^ Brown, Scott (September 8, 2017). "Vancouver mayor would welcome Amazon's $5-billion headquarters". Vancouver Sun. Retrieved September 20, 2017.
  124. ^ DC details HQ2 bidHQ2 DC City Paper
  125. ^ "Pitch to lure Amazon to Winnipeg appeals to company's frugality". CBC News. October 19, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  126. ^ "Manitoba premier, Winnipeg mayor say city is 'best choice' for new Amazon HQ". CBC News. September 9, 2017. Retrieved September 24, 2017.
  127. ^ Leung, Shirley (October 18, 2017). "Worcester to offer $500 million in incentives to lure Amazon". The Boston Globe. Retrieved October 27, 2017.
  128. ^ "Worcester will submit its own bid for Amazon megaproject". Telegram and Gazette. September 26, 2017. Retrieved September 30, 2017.

Washington Post is reporting that they know the location choice and when it will be announced

[edit]

Do you see how unethical this is? This is why I’m so adamant about not using Washington Post as a source for Amazon articles. Bezos owns the Washington Post so is it a coincidence that they get this “Breaking News” scoop about it? [2]

There is a distinction between newspaper ownership, editorial biases, and the newsroom reporting, something that a reputable newspaper like the Post would respect. The Post's editor himself says that Bezos does not interfere with newsroom reporting, so any accusation of a conflict of interest is itself violating this site's WP:NPOV policy. SounderBruce 23:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I’m aware Bezos says he doesn’t involve himself with the editorial decisions, but there are manh angles of this that must be taken into consideration. As many reports there are about this Amazon HQ2 process, every single outlet mentions that the DC metropolitan area has an “advantage” because Bezos owns WaPo and DC’s largest residence. (Even if people do use the WaPo source they’re still using an article that relies on speculation, not confirmation.) Amazon as a business sends complimentary daily emails advertising WaPo’s most read articles, exclusively; they don’t do that for any other paper. It’s not like they’re sleeping in separate rooms per se. Anyhow, what a coincidence it is that so-called “people close to the process” would give WaPo the first scoop. Of course in the article no one with all this so-called inside information wanted to comment on record so what’s the point. The outspoken Amazon economic director called these leakers out on the nda and tweeted that WaPo’s speculations are ridiculous. Who knows what’s actually in it because it’s an nda, but if they are in fact violating it then yes it is very biased behavior. If other editors want to come to the talk page I’m sure we can all discuss this thoroughly.Trillfendi (talk) 02:43, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cite your regulations and copy them here, don't willy nilly wave the the "neutral point of view" title of the Wikipedia policy without explaining specifically which part.

Your statement that to be skeptical of washington post stories is not neutral is fundamentally ridiculous. Basic media literacy requires skepticism. There is no where on this site where an assumed trust of sources is so absolute. Least of all something as silly as "the editor says his boss doesn't interfere so that proves it". Really embarrassing comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:A6A0:7D2:3D14:BCC1:73C1:8E25 (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Impending rumors should not be reported for an encyclopedic article in any case until more definitive evidence is available. I believe there is a Wikipedia policy on that somewhere but I don't know it so I can't cite it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:A6A0:7D2:3D14:BCC1:73C1:8E25 (talk) 22:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk, Speculation and unverified rumors will be reverted at all times, IP user. You simply reiterated what I already said. Marty Baron already addressed critical reporting of Amazon and how Bezos feels about it. But now we have actual Amazon executives calling out their irresponsible reporting on the matter and we’re supposed to cite that article without checks and balances from other sources? Comical.Trillfendi (talk) 22:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the first choice New York, and the second Washington,D.C. Both of those places are steeped in political and economic power, national and international; not the best choices for a company that benefits from fast internet service and product delivery. Maybe they aren't that interested in their current customers; maybe they are interested in negotiating more global?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Amazon HQ2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mgasparin (talk · contribs) 20:43, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


All right.

1.Is it well written? Looking at the grammar and quality of the prose, as well as WP:MOS for lead, weasel words, layout, etc., shows that the lead is within the guidelines of 4 paragraphs and does summarize the main body of the article. Also, I can't see any citation needed or NPOV tags, so good job there. As well, the article appears to flow without any abrupt stops or tangents.

2. Is it verifiable with WP:NOR?

All claims appear to be properly cited, with no plagiarism, and with all citations from WP:RS. Also, this article does not go into unnecessary detail.
The long section on the cancellation of the NYC project might seem a bit long, but I think that that is appropriate as it was a major event that needed proper explaining.

3. Is it neutral?

A. As I mentioned earlier, I could not find any NPOV tags on any sentences. As well, it seems to represent the major aspects of the article quite well, giving due weight to each.

4. Is it stable?

A. I was just looking through the edit history, and I can't find any long or frequent edit wars. The last instance of vandalism was on April 25 of this year, seen [[3]], but otherwise this article does appear quite stable.

5. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.
For a relatively short article (46 kB), there are plenty of images to illustrate the article. I have looked at the images used and they are all someone's own photographs.

Overall:

Conclusion: A well-written article. Not all good articles need to be long. Sometimes, the best articles are the ones which are concise, yet detailed, which is what this article is. Trillfendi, congratulations man. Good job. Mgasparin (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the review

[edit]

I have concerns with how fast and drive-by this review is, especially for a subject with quite a bit of political controversy surrounding it. Since I wrote much of the article, I can't review the article, but I do suggest getting a second opinion before declaring victory on this one. Mgasparin, I highly suggest that you gain more experience with GAs before conducting reviews. SounderBruce 21:02, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SounderBruce, if you would like a second opinion, I am more than willing to change the review. Personally, I disagree with your concerns about the brevity of the review. I had read through the article and am quite familiar with the guidelines presented here. I don't think you have to write paragraphs about the article in the review, but I also know that you should offer some comments to explain your reasoning, which I believe I did.
If there is anything that is unclear in how I reached my conclusions, I will gladly explain it. Thank you. Mgasparin (talk) 21:35, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Amazon HQ2

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Kept No reason has been given as to how this fails as a Good Article. Cites in the lead are not prohibited, I can see no outstanding tags and nothing on the talk page to suggest it fails any WP:GACR. As there is no real interest from the community an individual reassessment may be the way to go forward if anyone has concerns specific to the criteria AIRcorn (talk) 05:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When this article was given a GA review by Mgasparin back on 16 May 2019 and listed, the article's creator, SounderBruce, wrote have concerns with how fast and drive-by this review is, especially for a subject with quite a bit of political controversy surrounding it. Mgasparin stood by their review, but expressed willingness to consider a second opinion, at which point Trillfendi, who had nominated the article for GA earlier in May, added a GA nominee template asking for a second opinion, though the GA template was also left on the talk page. Unfortunately, the GA nominee template was badly malformed, so the nomination never appeared at WP:GAN.

What this article actually needs, since the review was not reopened at the time and the article has been listed as a GA for three and a half months, is a community reassessment. This allows everyone to comment on the article, including all three editors mentioned above, to assess whether it meets or fails to meet any of the GA criteria, and if it is lacking anywhere, for the article to be improved to the point that it meets the criteria, or to be delisted if sufficient improvement is not made.

I will notify the appropriate WikiProjects and finish cleaning up the article talk page. Best of luck to all concerned. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:20, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: Its been 2.5 months and still no comments. Do you want to give your opinion on whether it meets the criteria and then I can treat it like an individual reassessment and close it? AIRcorn (talk) 07:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'd have asked the nom to push all those citations currently in the lead into the sections (or all that don't represent controversial info). I didn't check, but when I see that many citations in the lead, I strongly suspect much of that information isn't already in the body sections. They were there in the reviewed version; I would have asked for that as a first step before continuing review, myself. --valereee (talk) 13:11, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon Japan customer service team

[edit]

Amazon Japan customer service concern and complain 220.255.49.131 (talk) 12:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amazon_HQ2&oldid=1240820954"