Jump to content

Talk:Amberley Museum & Heritage Centre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amberley Museum & Heritage Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Selection of images

[edit]

Images for this article should in my opinion reflect the diversity and ambiance of the museum. Also note Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images. Especially as the Amberley Museum Railway has its own article there should be at most one railway image in this article. There appears to have been a long standing bias with transport images and possibly emphasis on the individual transport item and with that in mind I will attempt to change images and a little content to match that diversity from the selection available on the commons.Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC) Okay I've had shot at providing a diverse range of images. I've tweaked the article content to help images be near content and checked the overall rendering seems acceptable on both narrow and wider screens and on a mobile device and it seems ok. But I know images choices are always subjective and I am not always the best I am colour defective which doesn't help! Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job, I've changed the railway image as the original is over-exposed. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]