Talk:Ambrose Dudley, 3rd Earl of Warwick/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: found and fixed two. Also fixed two broken ref links in the references section.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Prose is reasonably well written. I would suggest that if you wish to take this further, to WP:FAC, you brush it up to become excellently well written. Some of the sentences verge on the over-long, they might be better broken up and made plainer.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- On-line sources check out. Assume good faith for off-line, all appear reliable sources.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Appropriately used, tagged and captioned.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Fine. I find that this article satisfactorily meets the GA criteria. The prose could be improved but it is "reasonably well written". Passing as GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Thank you very much! Buchraeumer (talk) 21:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Congratulations! - PKM (talk) 21:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Buchraeumer (talk) 21:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)