Jump to content

Talk:American Anthropological Association

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Hmmm... seems a little lopsided with only about a third of the page dedicated to the AAA and two thirds related to controversies. Not that the controversies aren't interesting or important, but couldn't we have more general and background information?

Bibliography/Reference format

[edit]

The AAA has a specific format for citing resources in papers. I think this should be at least briefly mentioned in the article and how it relates to other formats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.20.13 (talk) 03:17, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Section on the AAA's Code of Ethics?

[edit]

Hi there!

I'm wondering if it would be helpful for this article to have a section on the AAA's Code of Ethics? It is mentioned in at least two articles (Human Terrain System and Ethnography) ...

Loriski (talk) 00:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly would!·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 00:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Will get the ball rolling then... Loriski (talk) 11:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RACE: Are we that different?

[edit]

In this section, there is implication that race was "invented". Are you saying that "race" is not hereditary. Putting the issues of Ethics, Legal and Social aside, can you just make a statement that DNA can or cannot be used to determine race. Human Genome Project has a statement:

DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair color can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another. There also is no genetic basis for divisions of human ethnicity.

This statement basically contradicts itself and needs a bit of clarification. If DNA is being used for criminal forensics, from bones are they able to determine if the race or ethnic? Same question for establishing paternity on living humans, can they determine dominant race?

When I see statements such as "race was invented", and "race is an illusion", I have to question genetic determinism for any purpose.

Mapsurfer49 (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another" sure they can. using overall genetic similarity a person is closer to the maxima of one cluster or another. they cannot be simultaeneously closer to two maxima. therefore races defined by genetic similarity population maxima are sharply discontinuous. further, one could define race as an arbitrary division of a spectrum, like map squares, again based on egnetic similarity. how are you defining race to claim no genetic patterns satisfy it? people assert this with no definition, so it's meaningless. SamOrange (talk) 08:55, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on American Anthropological Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

boycott of Israel

[edit]

Following up on the recent revert on the boycott of israel, I further note that the passage appears to be unsupported by the actual article that is cited: http://www.politicsforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=78&t=163640 -Dan Eisenberg (talk) 00:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is certainly premature to make any mention of this. The resolution has not been passed yet, but is going out for a general vote among the members. And even if it is passed the question of whether it is notable enough to mention will depend on the amount of media coverage it gets.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 02:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Could you link to guidelines that suggest the importance of media coverage. I am honestly curious because I have seen legal and social action mentioned with little media coverage. I could be entirely wrong and just curious if there is more detailed discussion on media coverage threshold suggestion. Cyphunk (talk) 02:52, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on American Anthropological Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on American Anthropological Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]