This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
A fact from American Communications Ass'n v. Douds appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Douds hasn't been overruled. The Court specifically declined to do so in Brown. But legal scholars (not the Supreme Court) doubt whether Douds is good case law any more, now that the Court has moved on to a different analysis. To say Douds was overruled (as one editor did in the infobox) is inaccurate. - Tim1965 (talk) 00:56, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, I misinterpreted what the article said. Circéus (talk) 01:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I did, too, in the first edition of this article. - Tim1965 (talk) 01:33, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
