Talk:American Mathematics Competitions

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics Competitions (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics Competitions, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Mathematics CompetitionsWikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics CompetitionsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematics CompetitionsMathematics Competitions articles

Mathematics Mid‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Red MOSP

The article claims that in 2004 9th graders were invited to MOSP, but I believe that 9th graders are still invited each year (a program know as Red MOSP). Should this be changed? Sardoodledom (talk) 17:31, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What?

"The AMC is extremely challenging, so even the valedictorian of a school may not do well."

Um... who cares how a person known for good grades does on a test for mathematical ability? --68.161.149.234 (talk) 11:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

The current introduction is far too in-depth for someone who stumbles upon this page. I suggest it be rewritten, though I can't write good introductions. 66.188.124.234 (talk) 22:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"scandal"

this section does not belong in this article, at least not in current form; there are very few sufficiently reliable sources, and wikipedia is not a newspaper, and also the to e is not neutral. i think the section should be deleted but i don't want to make an edit war Tapir1729 (talk) 21:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"A single source"

Is that really problematic if the "only source" is the host of the competitions? 98.47.228.44 (talk) 04:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]