Talk:Anbe Vaa (1966 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 07:38, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Will review within a few days.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:39, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Lede

• This was the second Tamil film to be shot at Jammu and Kashmir. -second ever or second of the director? Perhaps add ever to clarify.

 Done added "ever". Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 16:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Plot

• Link Shimla

 Done linked. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 16:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Production

• Come September wasn't a musical in the way something like Singing in the Rain or April in Paris was, it was a romantic comedy set in Italy.

 Done re-written as "romantic comedy film". Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 16:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

• Add a footnote on what puja is for not Indian readers

 Done Added footnote. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 16:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

• "the sound effect of the horses' footfall in "Rajavin Paarvai" was designed" -designed doesn't really fit here. Created perhaps.

 Done re-written as "created". Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 16:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Music

• Source tracklist

 Done Sourced. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 16:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Reception

• "Behindwoods.com called the friendship between M. G. Ramachandran and S. A. Ashokan in the film "a perfect example"." of what? Friendship? If so reword to "Behindwoods.com referred to the relationship between M. G. Ramachandran and S. A. Ashokan in the film as "a perfect example" of friendship".

 Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 16:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

• Is there anything negative to say about the film from anybody??

No. Nothing in particular. :) Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 16:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Legacy

• "The film became a trendsetter for romantic films in Tamil, which focused mainly on conflicts between lovers, as well as entertainment aspects. Films which followed the trend include: Kushi (2000), Lovely (2001), and Thiruda Thirudi (2003).[2][3" If it became a trendsetter (like Bond films and spoofs and Spaghetti westerns in the late 60s early 70s for instance) I'd have expected examples from late 60s and early 70s, you've jumped 35 years.

This section doesn't read too well. Some of it reads like short random factoids/trivia placed haphazardly. Can you try to improve the flow and structure of it? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Sources

• DVDs should really have distributor and year

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Looks reasonable now I think.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)