Talk:András Csonka

This article was nominated for deletion on May 29 2017. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because András Csonka has played in a competitive game between two teams from fully-professional leagues. He meets WP:NFOOTY --Fbgpwns5277 (talk) 04:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because this version includes a professional appearance, citing a reliable published source, that post-dates the relevant deletion discussion. Consequently it can't be "substantially identical to the deleted version" because it contains a change that does "address the reasons for which the material was deleted". cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]