Talk:Andrew Halliday (physician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I was adding a citation to the Albert Azzo II, Margrave of Milan article when I noticed that the author, Sir Andrew Halliday, did not have a Wikipedia entry. I placed a stub, & then put in an authorlink from the Azzo II page. Since then I added some more text & citations.

Please help by expanding this article. Mahalo! Peaceray (talk) 02:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image requested of the memorial plaque on his tomb at Saint Michael's in Dumfries, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland[edit]

No reason this needs to be on a separate article. We'd have another half-million or so articles if every bio entry had a separate 'list of works' entry for that author. LT910001 (talk) 06:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thoughts & consideration about this matter.
What's wrong with another half-million or so articles when there may be appropriate reasons for a separate 'list of works'?
I was following the axiom set forth in Wikipedia:Be bold when I separated the bibliography from the main article. I did so for several reasons.
  • In a printed encyclopedias & biographies, a comprehensive bibliography rarely goes in among the text, & is often placed separately in an appendix.
  • The processing of templates slow down the retrieval & display of an article. The Andrew Halliday (physician) bibliography contains 22 templates not counting the banner or the default sort.
  • In cases of diverse bibliographies, the reader of the biography article might be interested in one or two, or none, & the whole list for that reader would merely serve as visual clutter. To that point, I doubt the same reader would be interested in all subjects as different as royal genealogy, military assessments of Portugal, social reform efforts aimed at improving mental institutions, treatment of emphysema, & the history of the West Indies. If there was an appropriate way of collapsing the bibliography in the biographical article, like with the mobile app, then I think that would be a thing to consider, even if it meant one additional template.
Peaceray (talk) 05:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Proposed merge banner[edit]

I am removing the proposed merge banner as there has been no discussion of this for well over a year & because the format of the bibliographic list with its infobox will not fit neatly into the article. Peaceray (talk) 04:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iodine citation[edit]

Start of citation for introduction of iodine in Great Britain

Dr. Ryan Lecture on the Use of Iodine in the Cure of Diseases http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015057196233?urlappend=%3Bseq=216 London Medical and Surgical Journal, volume=3 |year=1833 |issue=59 page=204 |at=last paragraph, col. 1 http://ohsulibrary.worldcat.org/title/london-medical-and-surgical-journal/oclc/1623623&referer=brief_results

Peaceray (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrew Halliday (physician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:13, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]