Jump to content

Talk:Andrew Jackson and the slave trade in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Further reading

[edit]

Page is overloaded but some possible additional sources if anyone is interested:

jengod (talk) 18:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awed by this article--and a couple of questions

[edit]

I ran across this article on the "Signpost" which mentioned it as one of the most edited articles on Wikipedia. I was awestruck by the quality of your work. It's one of the best things I've read on Wikipedia.

I have a couple of questions. In the second summary paragraph you wrote a sentence that puzzled me. Jackson said that the cost of sending a slave to market was only 15 dollars. I wondered why that statement by Jackson was so important as to be in the summary paras and searched out the context. I concluded that the importance is that Jackson admitted in writing that he sent slaves to market -- not the 15 dollar bit. I think you might amend that sentence for clarity as to its importance.

Secondly, I scanned through the article to see if there was a mention of Arthur M. Schlesinger who wrote a Pulitzer prize winning biography of Jackson. As I recall from reading the biography decades ago, Schlesinger was admiring of Jackson. Jackson's reputation has taken a hit (and for good reason) since 1945 when the book was written. I would be interested in Schlesinger's take on Jackson and slavery. Or maybe I should just re-acquire a copy of the book and write an article on that.

Once again, my congratulations on a fine piece of work. Smallchief (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are very kind Smallchief. Implemented your excellent suggestion in the lede. Further comments, edits and cuts (it's too long!) very welcome. I will take a look at Schlesinger! jengod (talk) 15:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello The First Legionnaire just wanted to say thanks for the very thoughtful edit and also that, without objection, Im going to go back through and restore the removed redlinks. Partly per WP:REDLINK which states:

Red links are for subjects that should have articles but do not. They are not only acceptable, but needed in articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it. Only remove red links if you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject.

I know some people hate them--my friend Julie says they're ugly and refuses to add them--but I find them a helpful framework and/or I use them to bully myself into writing more articles for Wikipedia. I just checked my account and the following articles were created as a direct result of their redlinks on this page being irksome so the solution was to make them blue LOL: Pharsalia Race Course, Andrew Erwin (businessman), J. Winston Coleman, Boyd McNairy, Calvin Schermerhorn, Edward Ward (businessman), William Preston Anderson, N. A. McNairy, Fort Dearborn (Mississippi), Tennessee Gazette and Mero-District Advertiser, Joseph Erwin, Haysborough, Tennessee, Joseph Coleman (Tennessee), Port Gibson Correspondent, Natchez Ariel, Mississippi Free Trader, John Hutchings (slave trader), Pickering County, Mississippi Territory, The Book Farm, Philander Smith (Mississippi), Hunter's Hill (Tennessee), Walnut Hills (Mississippi), Harriet Chappell Owsley, Fairchild Creek (Mississippi), St. Catherine Creek, Abner Green, Peter Bryan Bruin

So anyway, red links are my path forward but just wanted to double check before restoring. Cheers, jengod (talk) 22:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cooper 1920

[edit]

Thank you for your work, Jen.

In this edit the lonely footnote {{sfnp|Cooper|1920|page=36}} was introduced. I poked around with a few :insouce searches, thinking I could find a source article where Cooper was used, alas, I failed. But maybe you meant {{sfnp|Carson|1920|page=36}}? "Page=36" fits the page range 26–38 in the source, doi:10.2307/1886569.

Best, Sam Sailor 19:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely meant Carson LOL if that's the pre-steamboat River transportation article. I swear I think i have proper name dyslexia or something. I'll clean it up when I get home if no one gets to it first. Thank you @Sam Sailor for helping resolve my myriad errors!! jengod (talk) 20:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to help, corrected in this diff. Best, Sam Sailor 20:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TYSM! jengod (talk) 20:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Burstein page numbers

[edit]

The Burstein page numbers seem wildly unlikely, going as high as 1444, but the book seems only to have about 320 pages according to Amazon etc. DuncanHill (talk) 13:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DuncanHill no doubt! I ordered a physical copy of the book from the library so I can replace with normal page numbers but right now I'm using an Amazon Kindle version that just describes things as "location 306 of 6172". I didn't know what else to do. jengod (talk) 14:30, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]