This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This page should not be speedily deleted because the deletion discussion took place nearly ten years ago. The subject has received coverage since then. --Thriley (talk) 07:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to read that she died. Let's let an administrator decide whether the recent coverage justifies declining the G4 speedy. Wikishovel (talk) 08:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As the previous deletion was 9 years ago and all three sources are more recent, I think we can assume that the article is not "substantially identical to the deleted version" (although I have not seen the previous text), so this is not eligible for G4. PamD 09:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
