Talk:Angels like You

Miley Cyrus Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Miley Cyrus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Miley Cyrus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Miley CyrusWikipedia:WikiProject Miley CyrusTemplate:WikiProject Miley CyrusMiley Cyrus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Notable?[edit]

I have found a few sources about the music video which may help demonstrate some notability:

--N Ø 17:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Official single or promo?[edit]

NME says it's the third single from the album: "Miley Cyrus has shared a video for her new single ‘Angels Like You’... Taken from the pop star’s latest album, ‘Plastic Hearts’, ‘Angels Like You’ follows singles ‘Midnight Sky’ and ‘Prisoners’ with Dua Lipa."

Hot Pop Today agrees: "Miley Cyrus Drops Music Video for New Single 'Angels Like You'... Miley Cyrus’s latest album Plastic Hearts already gave us a couple of pretty amazing singles, and “Angels Like You” is the next one in line... The singer’s latest album Plastic Hearts was released on November 27th and it previously produced the singles “Midnight Sky” and “Prisoner” featuring Dua Lipa."

My Journal magazine says it, too. "Just this week, Miley Cyrus dropped the much-anticipated music video for her latest single, Angels Like You."

Do we have any sources saying the song is NOT the third single? Binksternet (talk) 15:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Glad to be discussing this issue! Angels Like You was not released as any type of single or promotional. It is an album track that recived a simple music video. She doesn't even shot it properly. Its a video done with images of a concert with backstage content. Music videos are NOT single releases. Have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Peck s (talk • contribs) 15:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have made a few statements without referring to WP:SECONDARY sources. Can you show a published source saying the song is not a single? Binksternet (talk) 15:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Peck s, kindly stop edit warring. You are removing reliably sourced content. The Music Network has been used to source single releases before, per WP:SINGLESCRIT. Thanks.--N Ø 15:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of course there wont be any publication clamining a song isnt a single, why would any magazine do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Peck s (talk • contribs) 15:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Peck s, please elaborate how a song, that received a music video, live performance, an Australian radio impact date, a BBC Radio 1 add in the UK, and reliable secondary sources referring to it as a single, isn't a single. I am very curious to hear what exactly it is missing. Doggy54321, I am also surprised to see you endorsing this disruption. Perhaps, can you proffer an explanation? Thanks.--N Ø 16:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @MaranoFan: I haven't looked at the talk page yet, but now that I see that there are lots of sources calling the song a single, I definitely think the song should be listed as a single. I didn't see any sources calling the song a single before this. I don’t really care about the logistics, what radio it was sent to, how it was promoted, etc, I just care that there are sources calling the song a single (see how I handled the situation at Talk:Love Story (Taylor Swift song)#Single status). TMN is honestly very confusing, I think the source needs a discussion and a formal consensus before anything is implemented regarding it. Thanks! D🐰ggy54321 ^{(the Easter bunny has been summoned...)} 16:10, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Doggy54321:, thank you for taking the time to respond. Can you restore the single release to the article? The Smiler edit warring here seems to be more friendly towards you than me. Again, thanks.--N Ø 16:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MaranoFan: Will do, thanks! D🐰ggy54321 ^{(the Easter bunny has been summoned...)} 16:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was I violent towards anyone? In that case im sorry. And i am def not edit-warring. Just calling the song what the sources call it on the article, witch is SONG, and not single. On Wikipedia singles it states that clearly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Peck. s 16:18, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't think we should call it a single just because this user thinks we should. Anyway, im not edit warring, it's against wikipedia guidelines and i wont do it. But this is not aceptable

The irony is astounding. I have brought in multiple reliable sources and impact dates, while you are the only one who has only offered their opinion with no facts. And Wikipedia is a collaborative project, there is no "We vs This user". Learn this quickly or else non-collaborative behavior can result in a loss of editing privileges. Thanks.--N Ø 16:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]