Talk:Ann Bishop (biologist)

Ann Bishop (biologist) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 1, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
December 17, 2012	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 23, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ann Bishop, an early female protozoologist, studied treatments for parasitic diseases including amoebic dysentery and malaria?
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 19, 2017.
Current status: Good article

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Ann Bishop (biologist) is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ann Bishop (biologist)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sasata (talk · contribs) 23:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Comments in a few days. Sasata (talk) 23:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sasata, much appreciated. :) Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 23:46, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

consider putting a year in the picture if available
- The Royal Society doesn't give a year, not sure where else to find it. :( Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 17:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
the subject is tied to the UK, so British English should be used (honor->honour)
- Honor/honour was the only one I could find; did you see any others? Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 21:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I changed WWI to Second World War; that's all I see. Sasata (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ooh, didn't catch that. Thanks. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 04:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
possibly useful links: Bachelor's of Science, master's degree, Sydney J. Hickson (he's notable, and redlinks are ok), nuclear division
- Linked all of those, and Sydney J. Hickson is coming soon to an encyclopedia near you! :) Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 21:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
who awarded the John Dalton Natural History Prize?
- Manchester University, clarified that. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 21:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
the Haines 2001 and Ogilvie 2000 sources say her father was a cabinet or furniture maker
- Yeah, that was in the Royal Society source too. I've put that in now. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 21:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
should mention that her Cambridge D.Sc. was in title only as official degree were not given to females at that time
- Done. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 22:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
mention that she worked under David Keilin at Cambridge (looks like she named the parasite after him!)
- Done, cited to Ogilvie. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 22:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
the British Society for Parasitology now awards a "Ann Bishop Travelling Award", sound like it'd be worthy of a mention (see here)
- That's awesome, it's now mentioned at the end of the article. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 22:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
how about a publications list? Even "Selected publications" if the former would be too long.
- I've listed 10; her official Royal Society biography lists 62, which is obviously too many. How many do you think is appropriate? Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 22:27, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Looks like a pretty good selection there currently. Sasata (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
did she described any other new species? Does she have a zoological author abbreviation?
- None of that was mentioned in any of my sources. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 22:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - According to WORMS, it's "Bishop"; should add this using Template:Zoologist. Sasata (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Added. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 04:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
link somewhere to ‪List of female Fellows of the Royal Society‬
- Done in the lead. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 22:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
the ODNB has an entry on her with some more tidbits you might want to include (let me know if you can't access this and I'll send it to you). This source also says there were several obits (The Times (22 May 1990) · The Guardian (17 May 1990) · The Telegraph (22 May 1990)) that might have more info if you're inclined to dig a bit deeper.
- I can access the ODNB bit and will incorporate some of the information. I'm trying to dig up those obits in LexisNexis, but I can't access Who Was Who. If you could find that, I'd be forever grateful. :) Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 22:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: I found the first two obits but couldn't find The Telegraph's. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 23:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good additions! Unfortunately, I don't have access to Who Was Who. Sasata (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks, I guess I'll just have to forgo that, unfortunately. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 04:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I like the new images, they liven the place up. (But maybe three is one too many for the career section?) Consider, however, that the MoS discourages placing them at the start of new section, so you might want to right-align some. Also, since the purpose of this article isn't to educate about Plasmodium morphology, perhaps File:Malaria.jpg or similar might be a better choice? Sasata (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case, I'll drop the Plasmodium image and just leave the mosquito (formatting should be fixed too). Is that all right? Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 04:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I made a final tweak that you are free to revert. As I'm confident this article meets all the GA requirements, I'm happy to promote it now. Cheers, Sasata (talk) 04:45, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Awesome, thanks! Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 04:54, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pre FA feedback....[edit]

There's not alot on personal life, but I suspect that is due to a lack of published material. The lead looks a tad slim but it is a small article. Maybe some rewording can remove a "Bishop" or two as I see quite a few, but no biggie as one doesn't want to introduce ambiguity...Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the comments! It's true that there's not much about her personal life; she never married and was quite introverted and focused on her work. There's a little bit in a couple of the obits about how she liked food or something, but I'm not entirely sure that's relevant. I did expand the lead a little bit and did some rewording, does it look better now? Thanks again! Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 04:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better yes. Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ann Bishop (biologist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121127093622/http://www.bsp.uk.net/about-the-bsp/past-presidents/ to http://www.bsp.uk.net/about-the-bsp/past-presidents/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]