Talk:Ann Smith (activist)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
THis looks interesting... -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- I randomly googled three phrases and only turned up Wikipedia mirrors. Earwig's tool shows no sign of copyright violation.
- Refs:
- Lead:
- Early life:
- Political activisim:
- Suggest giving the names of the various earls she met with
- "Cochrane joined the conspirators." are they conspirators though... we haven't been told they are ... or that Smith is part of it yet.
- "Smith gave £1,000 to Monmouth " give an equivalent figure like for the money given to Argyll.
- One bit from the ODNB might need inclusion - the fact that Argyll's pre-execution letter to Smith was twice as long as his to his wife, and that he appears to have regreted that her activity had been brought up in his trial.
- I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth (talk) 18:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Looks good, passing now. Ealdgyth (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)