Talk:Anne-Marie Trevelyan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anne-Marie Trevelyan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Husband owner of estate

I (and OsbertH) removed content about her husband being the owner of an estate. The source says that the owner is J Trevelyan, which matches her husband's name but there is no indication from the source that it is the same person, so I removed it as WP:OR. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 18:24, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They are the same person - see bottom of this article - http://www.twhcbiomass.com/netherwitton-hall — Preceding unsigned comment added by RonSwan (talk • contribs) 20:28, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you have a read of WP:OR, using a primary source like this doesn't show that this content is notable. You would need a secondary source which says something like "A-M Trevelyan is married to J Trevelyan, who owns...." Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 21:29, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a video from Lazy Grace a respected Marketing company showing Mr Trevelyan mentioning he owns Netherwitton Hall, and in the description it thanks him and Anne Marie Trevelyan for letting them into their home. This with the previous sources should be enough. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx44WDJ9icw — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sproutx (talk • contribs) 08:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article from the main local newspaper http://www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk/news/victory-in-wind-farm-fight-1-2948983 refers to Mr trevelyan owning Netherwitton Hall, and refers to his wife Anne Marie. Hopefully this will be enough for you. Sproutx (talk) 09:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for posting this article, that is acceptable as a secondary source. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 09:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for accepting this source.Sproutx (talk) 09:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life

@Owlswick: I see you removed the info about her husband, claiming that it was dangerous given the current political climate for female politicians, this seems odd, as it is normal to have a personal life section about a politician, so I suspect it will be put back, but being from Oklahoma I don't know much about the political climate in Britain. Could you explaine this in more detale?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tornado chaser (talk • contribs) 23:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Racism row

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/cabinet-minister-anne-marie-trevelyan-22076194

Should this be tacked on the end of Parliamentary Career or in a separate section ("Controversies"? "Anti-Chinese criticism"?)Temp89 (talk) 22:28, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2015 swing

The statement that she was elected in 2015 with a swing of 4.4% was incorrect. The swing was 9.6% as is correctly shown in the Berwick-upon-Tweed (UK Parliament constituency) article (and is also given in various other sources). Her vote share in 2015 was indeed 4.4% higher than in 2010, but swing between two parties is calculated by combing the rise in one party's vote with the decline in the others. The Liberal Democrat vote fell by 14.8% - this means swing can be calculated by dividing the total of 4.4 and 14.8 (ie 19.2) by 2 which produces a figure of 9.6%. I have amended the article accordingly. Dunarc (talk) 18:58, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful links to website

NDNSWMI (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mention on Have I Got News Got For You

Havn't added to the article yet Trevelyan was mentioned on a recent Have I Got News Got For You, 5:20 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m0011fnm/have-i-got-news-for-you-series-62-episode-6 for her comment about the second jobs controversy, “I think the question of MPs having jobs that involve lobbying perhaps should be looked at again. But, across the board, I don’t think we should have a removal of the ability to maintain a second job, because it brings a richness to our role as members of parliament.” The Guardian article about this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/nov/17/mps-second-jobs-add-to-richness-of-political-life-says-minister

NDNSWMI (talk) 12:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to request

I will send, please give me time. 2600:1014:B110:7FB4:0:52:A69D:B501 (talk) 20:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

As per suggested, moved the controversy back into the rest of article. Have left two notes about campiagn finances as they seemed to be connected and grouped together, however if added to the article would seperated due to the polictical career section due to being in chronological order. Is this alright or should they merged into the rest of article? NDNSWMI (talk) 22:49, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Trevelyan did not endorse anyone else for the leadership [citation needed]"

In the Secretary of State for Transport section it's says Trevelyan did not endorse anyone else for the leadership" followed by a [citation needed]. Would a link to news article listing the endorsments from various Conservative MPs and seeing her name not there among anyone other than Boris Johnson be enough for a citation. If not how do go about citing something that didn't happen? Captain Wacky HJS (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]