Jump to content

Talk:Anne Curtis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relationships?

[edit]

The paras on Sotto,Gutierrez and Araneta are fine.

This is nonsense - "Curtis categorically states in interviews that she has only had three boyfriends, but this does not stop the entertainment press from linking her to other men, especially when she became officially single again after her break-up with third boyfriend Paolo Araneta."

WP shouldn't be spreading tabloidal coverage of her life. Manzano has been declared as her best friend and soulmate, so we could fit him in somewhere else in the article. Is there any proof that she was ever with Milby? As for Champ, she has categorically denied ever being with him.

If there are no objections,I'll be removing all of this in 48 hours.. Any editor with views or comments about the same, please post it on this talk page.

Thanks xCentaur | 07:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TV Patrol Video

[edit]

I added this very first:Video - Star Patrol: A glimpse on Anne Curtis as 'Dyosa' --Florentino floro (talk) 07:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsements

[edit]

Someone should mention about her endorsements. That's a huge part of what makes her "the princess of all media". MissFeFe808 (talk) 02:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Such trivial fluff about her is unnecessary, unless if the endorsements in question are significant and notable enough, rather than just a mere sponsorship from some cosmetics brand or something like that. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is "trivial fluff" if in her awards and nominations section, she was in the list of top endorsers in 2011. 82.18.247.249 (talk) 02:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that there should be a mention of her endorsements. I'm sorry if it wasn't a very good section, but I do believe that it deserves to be there. Although poorly written on my part as it being my first time to do so, it didn't deserve to be written off, but maybe revised to be a more thoroughly structured paragraph. If you consider it to be "trivial fluff" then you would say the same of Beyonce Knowles, Britney Spears and Carrie Underwood's pages among many others.82.18.247.249 (talk) 02:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for Underwood and a few others having a section for their endorsements is because they have enough credible backing to qualify for inclusion, or if they were ambassadors for a certain organisation to which we can reliably vouch on their legitimacy. Simply providing a list of Anne's commercial appearances without any backing or with poor references, i.e. blog sites or YouTube videos, won't cut it if you ask me. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Anne Curtis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Anne Curtis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]