Talk:Annie Larsen

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / World War I Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	World War I task force

Bizarre whitewashing

Whitewriter, can you explain this edit? In your zeal to remove any mention of the Boka Star, you replaced that entry in the See-also section with... a link to a page which is already linked in the body of the article. It's difficult to understand how this edit could be motivated by any kind of interest in improving the Annie Larsen article. bobrayner (talk) 17:48, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I always link important sub-articles in See also, no matter if they are mention somewhere above in article... In this way reader will easily pass to other article to get complete story. Do not fork this discusion, move to Talk:Arms trafficking. --WhiteWriter^speaks 17:57, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, WP:SEEALSO has been a secondary casualty of your headlong rush to remove any mention of one particular ship:

the 'See also' section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes

bobrayner (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]