Talk:Anomochilus weberi/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 02:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Grabbing this review, will have notes out soon. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 02:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Images

• Only one image. rights are in order.
• Needs an image caption
  • Added.
• Consider adding ALT text.
  • Done.

Sourcing

• Nothing of note.

Copy-vios

• Earwig gives the all clear
• Nothing on spot checks.

Prose

• 'dwarf pipesnake family Anomochilidae.' awkward phrasing
  • Standard formatting across most taxon articles I've written, don't really know a better way to write it.
• "In 1890, the Dutch herpetologist..." Sentence is difficult to follow
  • Split it up.
• "authorities merge the latter family into the former" be more specific, tighten up sentence as a whole
  • Added names of families, not sure how to tighten the sentence up.
• "When preserved in alcohol, the species' color changes to mainly brown" Sentence is out of sequence with the rest of the paragraph
  • Rearranged para.
• 'Greater Sunda Islands' specify that this is part of Malaysia, Brunei, and Indonesia
  • Added Indonesian Archipelago, which makes more sense biogeographically and should still be identifiable for a lay audience.

---

Comment: Okay, this is really close to GA criteria already, apologies if I'm being a bit nit-picky with this. It's short as well, so the review is going to be equally short. I made a few minor edits, please review when you can. On hold. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 19:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

@AryKun, giving you a customary ping. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 19:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Etriusus, have addressed all of your comments. Thanks for the review! AryKun (talk) 12:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

🏵️Etrius ( Us) 17:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.