Jump to content

Talk:Anthony Sullivan (pitchman)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 14 February 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Seems top be consensus that there is not a clear primary topic.(non-admin closure) Turnagra (talk) 04:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


– Per pageviews and google search. 204.184.47.150 (talk) 14:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 15:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom --The Tips of Apmh 15:31, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose, not convinced there's a PRIMARYTOPIC by long-term significance.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. No primary topic for this minor article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The subject dominates in usage and page views and appears to meet our primary topic standards. That it is a "minor" article isn't relevant (although I'd say it's hard to say a subject that gets over a hundred views per day is minor by most standards), as we determine primary topic by comparing to others of the same name. A subject can be the most insignificant-seeming subject in the world and still be a primary topic.--Yaksar (let's chat) 06:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. While neither of the sportspeople has a great deal of long-term significance, either is more significant than this media personality. The case for primary topic is very weak indeed. But I question whether (pitchman) is a suitable disambiguator. I had to look up what it means, and note that Pitchman has been redirected to both Hawker and Spokesperson (or Spokesman) at various times. I cannot find any other current use of this disambiguator and think it should be avoided. Andrewa (talk) 17:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. No PTOPIC among these three people. I agree with Andrewa that the disambiguator (pitchman) is unclear if not unintelligible. Narky Blert (talk) 16:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.