Talk:Antideficiency Act

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

Untitled[edit]

Deleted section about TARP: The section lacks any reference to back up a pretty substantial accusation (TARP is unconstitutional). In addition, the ANY in all caps clearly is a shouty bit of poor netiquette. It seems to be trafficking in conspiracy-ness about TARP rather than substantive contributions about the subject for Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crock1701 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GAO description of act[edit]

The GAO has a good description of the act which doesn't quite map onto this article. Specifically it states that not only 1341 but also 1342 and 1517 are part of the Anti Deficiency Act. Too busy to incorporate all the stuff in the page into the article but thought I'd leave the reference for other editors to incorporate. TMLutas (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The act in practice[edit]

For completeness and to make this article more relevant we should probably add a section about the act in practice, not just as initially written and it's history. Here's a few potential sources: Washington Post, The Atlanic, both of which are via and expanded on in The Verge (which may not be cite-able but may have more source-able links). This article will probably become very popular as people see articles citing the Antideficiency act applies to the current shutdown of the government and that makes content about how it applies, not just now but in any shutdown situation encyclopedic. Cat-five t c ---- 22:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's information on the act, direct from the GAO, [1]. Cat-five t c ---- 23:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antideficiency Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110128162819/http://www.justice.gov:80/olc/appropriations2.htm to http://www.justice.gov/olc/appropriations2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]