Jump to content

Talk:Antireligious campaigns in China

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 October 2019 and 13 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jsibay3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction in this article?

[edit]

Hey, this article says that China's anti-religious campaign began in 1949, after the cultural revolution, but the article on the cultural revolution says it occurred from 1966 to 1976. Can someone check this out, I am not knowledgeable enough to feel comfortable fixing this. Thanks. Watermelon-lemon (talk) 03:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

186.96.77.74 (talk) 02:43, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

[edit]

I think harvesting the organs of citizens and or foraigners sentenced to death is okey, because the state can use their organs to help people that especifically need those organs... Human rigts do kill people... However, I am Christian and do believe atheism is evil.

More reliable sources needed

[edit]

Indeed: Reference #46 is from "The center for security policy", a US far-right, anti-Muslim, Washington, D.C.-based think tank. The Center and Gaffney have been criticized for propagating conspiracy theories according to Wikipedia's own article published here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Security_Policy#

This page needs more reliable sources (See: WP:RSP) added to it. Some sources here, particularly citations to NGO websites, can be challenged and may end up getting removed. - Amigao (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why challenge NGO's as sources or any of the RS in the midst of a genocide? Why make unnecessary editing war when foreigners aren't allowed in Tibet to document the crimes? Why open the subject when monks and nuns are being arrested/disappeared for documenting on social media? Why obsessively add [citation needed] tags, and now threaten to delete text with RS? And, @Amigao what's with the link brackets around the word 'rape' after obsessively removing link brackets, which also disrupted the ability to save edits in progress, a few days ago? Pasdecomplot (talk) 19:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like that edit came from an IP address. Here it is: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antireligious_campaigns_in_China&oldid=977091611
This page has good potential but WP:RSP sources in green should preferably be used, especially for contentious claims. That just makes the page stronger. - Amigao (talk) 22:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 April 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Antireligious campaigns in ChinaAntireligious campaigns of the Chinese Communist Party – Per WP:PRECISION Amigao (talk) 22:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 02:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I tend to agree that  WP:PRECISION may be required to be WP:CONCISE for this article. Indeed, there have been anti-religious campaigns during various periods in Chinese history. The article's subject is the campaigns by the CCP only, and not, for example, those by emperors during the dynasties in China. So, I can see that the proposed title change would unambiguously identify this article's subject. Thank you. Path2space (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.