A fact from Antonia of Württemberg appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kabbalah, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.KabbalahWikipedia:WikiProject KabbalahTemplate:WikiProject KabbalahKabbalah articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Also, for copyright reasons, I thought it was quite useful to indicate what had come from German WP.
But as regards the verification issue, the German article draws closely from the Landesarchiv Baden-Württemberg March/April 2005 Archivale des Monats feature, as the ref in the article cites, and that is a WP:RS. Jheald (talk) 18:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I always AGF, but to use a wikipedia for reference is ... discussible. For copyright reasons using the template {{translated}} here on the talk page is enough, as it's done for all translation (see also this discussion). You may add the {{de}} to the article itself.
Also, I doesn't question the Landesarchive source. In my opinion, it's better to link the reliable source directly (with the {{citation}} template), and if you had a look at http://www.landesarchiv-bw.de/web/45763, so this is your source. Sebastian scha. (talk) 19:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK; changed as you suggest. Jheald (talk) 22:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
