Talk:Antonio Paoli/GA1
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a good article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:good article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted by Pyrotec 10:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Intial comments
[edit]- This certainly looks like a Good Article, so it will pass (in due course); however, I noticed a fair number of direct quotations, e.g "this is a quotation", most of which are uncited. This needs to be addressed before gaining GA-status.
- I will now start my detailed review, but as usual I'm leaving the WP:Lead unitl last. I will mostly be commenting on problems, so if I don't comment on a section here it means that I consider it to be OK. Pyrotec (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Early years -
- His family -
- The first paragraph as a whole is a direct quotation from ref 2, but it is not marked as such.
- The second paragraph as a whole is a direct quotation from ref 2, but it is not marked as such.
- His home: Casa Paoli -
- This as a whole is a direct quotation from ref 2, but it is not marked as such.
- Review On Hold. Pyrotec (talk) 16:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Initial comments on revised version
[edit]- I note that the "problems" due to block-copying from Juan Llanes Santos (August 11, 2009) have been resolved.
- Citations
- The article is generally well-referenced, but there are a few paragraphs that are under-referenced; but that is probably a consequence of the following:
- This article is heavily reliant on the US Department of the Interior, National Parks Service, National Register of Historic Places Registration Form, prepared by Juan Llanes Santos, which is a comprehensive source of information.
- As such, this article might (incorrectly) regarded as being a {{One source}} article.
- The National Register of Historic Places Registration Form, Section 9, has a Bibliography which contains mostly primary sources, however, it does contain two secondary sources.
- I would recommend that these two secondary sources are investigated, as they could provide additional information which could improve this article.
- I've also looked in Credo, but can't find any information.
Pyrotec (talk) 10:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An interesting and readable article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Yes.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Yes, but see my commenta above.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'm awarding this article GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 10:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]