Talk:Antonio del Corro
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Different opinion]
[edit]Different opinion: there is now a new article at Reginaldus Gonsalvius Montanus which expresses a different view.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 14:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Antonio del Corro
[edit]Re: Reginaldus Gonsalvius Montanus. The Antonio del Corro article maintains that he is Reginaldus. I left this comment there "Different opinion: there is now a new article at Reginaldus Gonsalvius Montanus which expresses a different view.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 14:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Antonio_del_Corro" Perhaps you could investigate this.--Felix Folio Secundus 20:12, 19. Sep. 2009 (CEST)
Inquisition book of somebody
[edit]Hi you have written this on my talk-site: Re: Reginaldus Gonsalvius Montanus. The Antonio del Corro article maintains that he is Reginaldus. I left this comment there "Different opinion: there is now a new article at Reginaldus Gonsalvius Montanus which expresses a different view.... Perhaps you could investigate this.
Ok, I study a little bit theologie. So I came from this side to the article: Reginaldus Gonsalvius Montanus. Step 1: First I have written the german article and an english Revision of Reina-Valera. (By this work I looked on the spanish wikipedia-site). Step II. I made the german site of Casiodoro de Reina and an english revision. (By this work I looked again on the spanish wikipedia-site). On the history of this site Casiodoro de Reina I can see that you have seen this. (Thanks for the mistake correction.) On the word "rigidity" in this article you can see that somebody (before me) used the spanish wikipedia site of this article. This sentence: ... rigidity of the Consistory to be salutary. I suppose is not very good to understand.
So, you have seen that this information was on this site before I came. But now Sources were I find this oppinion too:
1. Erich Wenneker: REINA, Cassiodoro di. In: Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon (BBKL). Band 7, Herzberg 1994, ISBN 3-88309-048-4, Sp. 1524–1528.
look on the section works of the article Cassiodoro de Reina.
2. in the text: [http://www.ritmanlibrary.nl/c/r/pdf/castellio_widerstand1-gilly.pdf PDF: Sebastan Castellio und der politische Widerstand gegen Philipp II. von Spani
you can read that this is common error - can you german?
(in Hermann Dechent: Reina. In: Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie (ADB). Band 27, Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig 1888, S. 720–723. a very good source, is nothing to read about the inquistion etc.)
now I will look into the internet to find something about the problem. (my next article would be a german site about the mathew bible).
mfg Soenke Rahn with friendly greetings Soenke Rahn (talk) 14:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Antonio del Corro
[edit]Re: Reginaldus Gonsalvius Montanus. The Antonio del Corro article maintains that he is Reginaldus. I left this comment there "Different opinion: there is now a new article at Reginaldus Gonsalvius Montanus which expresses a different view.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 14:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Antonio_del_Corro" Perhaps you could investigate this.--Felix Folio Secundus 20:12, 19. Sep. 2009 (CEST)
- Thank you for your reply: your research looks good, It would be hard for me to read the Spanish and my German is only a little vocabulary. The most recent encyclopedia article (1994) is probably best as the author will have read some of the other relevant studies. Best wishes.--Felix Folio Secundus 16:51, 20. Sep. 2009 (CEST)
to the last entrys:
[edit]The last entrys, I have copied from the user sites (compare this), because it's important for the discussion!
Soenke Rahn (talk) 18:15, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Antonio del Corro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070918181526/http://en.literaturabautista.com/node/2 to http://en.literaturabautista.com/node/2
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723233916/http://www.hadland.me.uk/tvp/tvp10.htm to http://www.hadland.me.uk/tvp/tvp10.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160123050118/http://www.larramendi.es/i18n/consulta_aut/registro.cmd?control=POLI20090013797 to http://www.larramendi.es/i18n/consulta_aut/registro.cmd?control=POLI20090013797
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 7 July 2017 (UTC)