Talk:Anwaar ul Haq Kakar

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anwaar ul Haq Kakar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Pakistan: Balochistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Balochistan, Pakistan (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani politics.
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

On 16 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Anwar ul Haq Kakar to Anwaar ul Haq Kakar. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 16 August 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 18:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anwar ul Haq Kakar → Anwaar ul Haq Kakar – move to correct official name per PM office[1] and Senate of Pakistan[2] TheNewYork Times[3], Reuters[4], Dawn[5] 2402:E000:601:5955:F8C:531:D3D5:61E6 (talk) 18:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). SilverLocust 💬 15:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine then, contact an admin to move the page. ⭐️ Starkex ⭐️ 📧 ✍️ 20:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. "Anwar" is a different name than "Anwaar". Persona2two (talk) 06:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

He has never met waqas ashraf even though waqas might claim that he has 2A00:23C8:4C82:9001:84DB:48C9:710D:4FCB (talk) 19:12, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: It's unclear what you're asking for - nowhere in the article does it claim that he has met them. Tollens (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anwaar ul Haq Kakar lived as an Afghani refugee in the United Kingdom

Can we add in this article of Mr. Kakar that, before returning to Pakistan in 2005, he lived in the UK as an Afghan refugee or asylum seeker? [6]HarryDaBunny101 (talk) 10:53, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The information you trying to request is without a source/comes from a YouTube video which can't be trusted and is meant for stretched claims, also see WP:PEACOCK. Starkex (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded removal and POV tag

@Saqib Why have you removed this section of the article?: [1] I inserted that ALONG with his criticism, not only that, you put a POV tag. I used sources, and you never really explained why you removed it, nor did you try to discuss it. You did the same thing on the Asim Munir page, until I called it out and the article was fixed. I need you to remain balanced and impartial please, even if it’s on figures that you don’t particularly have a liking towards. VirtualVagabond (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, POV tag was added without any discussion, see :WP:DRIVEBY-TAGGING VirtualVagabond (talk) 10:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@VirtualVagabond: I removed it because the verification cleartly fails. Can you please point out where in the cited reference it verifies the claims? The source doesn't even mention Kakar at all. Let's refrain from making baseless accusations about personal preferences without evidence. --Saqib (talk) 11:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never said it was Kakar himself, I said it was under his tenure. VirtualVagabond (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot cite this reference here unless Kakar is explicitly mentioned in the source. Otherwise, it could be considered OR. And by the way, on how many pages, have I added tags in the last 30 days? I believe it's only been on a couple of articles, so it's inaccurate to suggest that I'm engaging in WP:DRIVEBY. --Saqib (talk) 11:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There isn’t a minimum amount of edits that you have to tag without discussion to achieve WP:DRIVEBY. I’m assuming good faith from you, so please discuss such measures in the future. Thank you. VirtualVagabond (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, one question. You didn’t remove his criticism, despite those sources not mentioning a kakar as well. Could I please ask why? VirtualVagabond (talk) 11:10, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't reviewed all the references, but a majority of them fails verification. That's why I added the tag. It should remain there until the issues are resolved. I did some cleanup, though. --Saqib (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems awfully convenient that you so just happened to skip the criticism that was actually there before the appraisal. Nevertheless, I’ll take your word on it, thank you. VirtualVagabond (talk) 12:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would say Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Also why you keep on removing tags even though the concerns aren't addressed yet. --Saqib (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you put it on because of his public life section, when we removed it altogether, I thought the issue was resolved. Is there anything else that you think warrants the tag? VirtualVagabond (talk) 13:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]