Talk:Apostolnik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

De-stubbed[edit]

This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified.

By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubified.

If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 16:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a number of banners above. By definition, just about any article three paragraphs in length or less (like this one) qualifies as a stub. Therefore, I am assessing the article as "Stub-class" on all the banners. John Carter 20:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Content[edit]

I moved the sentence about the difference between Orthodox and Roman Catholic nuns to the article on Nuns, where it seemed more appropriate MishaPan 13:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted image[edit]

Does anyone know why the File:Nuns001.jpg image was deleted from Wikipedia? It was a very good image that has been used in several articles. MishaPan 22:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

A photograph would help the article quite a bit. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 22:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

source needed[edit]

The article states:

"[The apostolnik] is usually replaced with the epanokamelavkion when the nun becomes a rassophor..."

I question this. I have never, ever seen a Russan Orthodox nun not wear the apostolnik. Without it their hair is not covered, and nuns never allow their hair to be visible the way monks do. MishaPan (talk) 01:14, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apostolnik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]