Jump to content

Talk:AppleToo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Withdrawn did you know nomination[edit]

I created {{Did you know nominations/AppleToo}} because the template wasn't created. I boldly tweaked some grammar (Apple Inc and skipped day of month), feel free to readjust as you see fit. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 09:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

Converted from a redirect by 74.89.25.100 (talk).
General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: The article does not seem neutral, considering the biased words rarely use quotations, the article also does not seem plagiarism free, with 10 percent of plagiarism, TheNuggeteer (talk) 03:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TheNuggeteer a comprehensive DYK review would give more specific feedback. Which words are biased or WP:WEASEL? Can you give examples so that the nominator can make the relevant improvements? And regarding copyright violation, a percentage doesn't say much. Checking earwig, I checked several examples and determined them to be false matches, or appropriately used, e.g an attributed quote. If you have specific copyright violations in mind, please explicitly mention which ones. The tooling and percentages are meant to guide the search but are not a substitute for in-depth analysis. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:47, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shushugah According to WP:CONTENTIOUS "racist" and "sexist" (and probably others: racial discrimination, ableism, assault) are words to watch, considering they are not confirmed (regarding the ongoing 2024 lawsuit). I recommend (also according to WP:ALLEGED) to add alleged and to put quotes beside the alleged words. TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, regarding the copyright, I've changed the checklist from blank to yes. Considering the mistake. TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]