Talk:Arab Spring concurrent incidents

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge[edit]

I think it was a mistake to carve out this section from the main article, it dosn't have enough weight to stand out on it's own and how are these "concurrent incidents", this is the Arab Spring! It also seems like everyone just forgot about this page after the split, which is probably why it's so embarrassingly out of date, it seems like that happens alot with these kinds of misguided splits (remember what happened to the page "Overview of the Arab Spring". Charles Essie (talk) 23:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support This is an odd topic (or at least title) for a Wikipedia article. Merging seems prudent. —Ost (talk) 16:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Since every section in this article points to a main article on that specific set of protests, I think the content from this article can be trimmed down even more and added back into the main article. The concurrent article does not offer anything that isn't contained in the main Arab Spring article or the individual articles linked to from this one. —Zujine|talk 16:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't Merge I think the reason this article is here is that the first one was too damn long. Sort of like the problems with World War II. I think we need more tinkering with THAT article and changed the title for this one to something like, I dunno, Arab Spring: Lesser (or Minor) incidents.Ericl (talk) 13:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that length is an issue, it's just that this article is such a joke, maybe we should just delete it and slightly expand the minor events section of the main article, just a quick overview is all that's really needed. Charles Essie (talk) 19:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - we can have an incidents article, but summary should be present in the main article.GreyShark (dibra) 14:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This article is not big enough to stand alone. — Lentower (talk) 00:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we should merge the two together because one of 'em as serious faults whereas the other one is perfectly fine... :T — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.172.93.225 (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - it is already one year since the merge was initiated, and there doesn't seem to be a strong consensus to do so (4 supports including nominator and three opposes including one IP). Per WP:GF i however do see that data from this page must be present at the Arab Spring article as well, and currently when restructuring it, i would take this in mind.GreyShark (dibra) 18:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on Arab Spring concurrent incidents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Arab Spring concurrent incidents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 44 external links on Arab Spring concurrent incidents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 50 external links on Arab Spring concurrent incidents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arab Spring concurrent incidents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Arab Spring concurrent incidents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Arab_Spring_concurrent_incidents&oldid=1198893821"