Jump to content

Talk:Archer (horse)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why Not a B

[edit]

I can't see any reason why this shouldn't be upgraded to B. It certainly meets the criteria, and compares well with other B articles I have looked at.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 19:24, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.Cuddy Wifter (talk) 22:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Archer (horse). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archer (horse). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The term "Race Record"

[edit]

I note that a summary of all of the horse's race starts is described as a 'Race Record'. In my experience the term 'Race Record' is used to define the fastest time run by a winner in the history of an event up to that renewal (usually of a stakes or group/grade/black type race) and is often abbreviated as 'RR' or '(RR)' and which is not a track record or course record or some national or international time record. 'Racing Record' or 'Past Performances' in USA speak may be more appropriate. Perhaps the wikipedia bureaucracy has some rule about this of which I am ignorant. Cheers Tom (USA) Rolfe (talk) 03:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]