Talk:Archimedean point
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
old name for orthocenter?
[edit]On http://jeff560.tripod.com/o.html it says " ORTHOCENTER. An earlier term was Archimedean point. "
can somebody colloborate this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WillemienH (talk • contribs) 22:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Should Hawking be added under Criticism?
[edit]I don't feel qualified to explain the how of it, but in On the Origin of Time (2023), Thomas Hertog describes Hawking's final theory doing away with the Archimedean Point. Teledyn (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class philosophy of science articles
- Low-importance philosophy of science articles
- Philosophy of science task force articles
- Stub-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- Stub-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class physics history articles
- Physics history articles
- Stub-Class history of science articles
- Low-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles