Talk:Area code 321

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
Brevard County, Florida	Seminole County, Florida

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Dialing plan[edit]

Is it 10-digit dialing throughout all of 321, or just the section overlaying 407? (In other words, would a local call in Brevard County be 7 or 10 digits?) CrazyC83 (talk) 23:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seven; no area code is required to dial from one 321 number to another. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to calls between places which are exclusively in 321? I take it 10 digits would be used for local calls in places served by the 407/321 overlay, but what if you are calling from exclusively-321 location to a 321 area number which is in the 407/321 overlay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 19:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What was this rejected Chicago-area proposal?[edit]

I see this comment in this article, and it's about the assignment of this area code (321):

"it was assigned to the area, instead of suburban Chicago"

Please explain this rejected proposal regarding suburban Chicago. Notice that 321 is just a two-digit transposition away from 312, which was the original Chicago-area area code (excluding fringe suburban areas in area 815). 312 has split twice and thus remains only in downtown Chicago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Area code 321. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120704090721/http://www.satcomdirect.com:80/main/company/about-us.aspx to http://www.satcomdirect.com/main/company/about-us.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]