Talk:Argentine Sea

Oceans Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Oceans To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : List of oceanographers, create a comprehensive article on Concentrations of marine debris out of all the gyre and "garbage patch" articles
Copyedit : Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Expand : Coral Sea, Endeavour Strait, Greenland Sea, Solomon Sea
Photo : find images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the oceans
Stubs : Oceanography stub articles, Marine geography stub articles, Aleutian Trench, Bellingshausen Sea, Caernarfon Bay, Gerlache Strait, Gulf of Oman, Iceland Sea, Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Update : Botany Bay, Wilkins Sound, Mariana Trench, Challenger Deep
Verify : Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Bering Sea, Gulf of Aden, Iceberg B-15, Ionian Sea, Japan Trench, Moreton Bay, Sound (geography), Timor Sea
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia

Argentina Mid‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentine Geography. If you would like to participate, you can improve Argentine Sea, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Antarctica

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cleanup message[edit]

Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.

Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 13:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scotia Sea[edit]

Is this the same thing as the Scotia Sea (as that article suggests)? If so, there should be a merger.-86.134.12.250

Scotia Sea doesn't reach the Rio de la Plata. It might be contained in the Argentine Sea, but they are not equivalent. --Mariano(t/c) 02:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map requested[edit]

If anyone is capable of making a map to show the location of this sea relative to its nearest landforms (i.e., Argentina et al.) and larger bodies of water (i.e., the Atlantic et al.), it would be much appreciated! Robert K S (talk) 18:16, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The current map is bogus. Can we get a new one showing the generally accepted 150 meter depth line? Hcobb (talk) 21:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Map showing a clear line WAY below the 150 meter depth limit halfway between Argentina and the Falklands.

http://oceana.org/sites/default/files/explore/ocean448scosea_002.gif

Case closed. Hcobb (talk) 15:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine sea is not linked to a particular depth, but to the continental shelf. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_shelf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.126.151.137 (talk) 06:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does it exist?[edit]

Does this sea even exist or has someone just made it up? Is it the point of Wikipedia to be making up new things? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.105.91 (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

not the place for this in the lead ....[edit]

See: The Antarctic Master Directory for research regarding the location and biodiversity in the Argentine Sea. Link: http://gcmd.nasa.gov/KeywordSearch/Metadata.do?Portal=amd&KeywordPath=%5BKeyword%3D'fish'%5D&OrigMetadataNode=GCMD&EntryId=scarmarbin_cnp-peces&MetadataView=Full&MetadataType=0&lbnode=mdlb5 - I removed this and put it here. Not sure what the purpose of it is, but we don't "link" this way in Wiki. For a sea that doesn't exist except in the political attitudes of some Argentine nationalists, I propose this article is just a POV fork and should be deleted. HammerFilmFan (talk) 16:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The UK Falkland Islands claim boundary starts from the midpoint between Argentina and the Islands to the West[edit]

The claim boundary doesn't start from the midpoint, as the image in the linked reference shows. The midpoint is the hyphened line whereas the boundary is the green/blue EEZ division. Dab14763 (talk) 20:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Argentine Sea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]