Talk:Ariel VI
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ariel VI article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |  |
Templates and other recent edits[edit]
@CRS-20: Let's talk about the changes on the talk page here. Discussions about articles should be performed on the talk page of the article and not your own talk page. I do appreciate that you are asking questions and using talk pages though, that is a great for collaboration. It would also be good if you used accurate edit summaries to explain the changes you are making, it helps other editors review them.
I use the unit conversion template to make the article accessible to more readers. Both countries routinely use imperial units, so it is even more applicable than usual here. I would actually lead with the imperial units if most didn't consider this an article on science. See WP:UNITS for more information.
I removed your break tag and used the unbulleted list template. The break tag is ok, but using the unbulleted list when listing multiple items helps with accessibility. See MOS:PLIST for more information.
For the date templates, see Template:Start-date for more information on why that is useful. Though I am looking into start-date vs start date, not sure if one is more appropriate. Same goes for end-date.
I added back the non-breaking spaces. They are intended to keep the number/unit on the same link. See MOS:NBSP for more information.
In the prose, I changed 23:26 to 23:26:00, to show that the precision is to the second. Leaving it off means it could be interpreted as having occurred at any point during that minute window. I can see an argument for less precision, but I think we typically use precision down to the second for these cases.
Hope that clears things up. I have left the other changes you made. Let me know if you have any questions thanks. Kees08 (Talk) 18:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)