Talk:Aristocrat (fashion)

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Japan: Culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 14:21, May 8, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Culture task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

I'm going to nominate this for PROD, unless...[edit]

This entry is redundant and pointless, since all of the information within it is already covered in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gothic_Lolita . I'm going to propose it for deletion unless its author wants to merge it over to Gothic Lolita first. I'll give them a week before I do so. Bricology (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Threats aren't how we do it here. Merge tag it and see if it holds water. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This probably should be merged to something[edit]

One of this page or Elegant Gothic Aristocrat is redundant. I'm pretty sure this should be merged. I don't know how to propose that formally, or do that, or anything, 'though. Could someone who knows more than I do... ? 24.7.113.176 (talk) 00:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aristocrat (fashion). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.rebelsmarket.com/RebelsMarket
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140722172404/http://fashion.3yen.com/category/elegant-gothic-lolita/page/2/ to http://fashion.3yen.com/category/elegant-gothic-lolita/page/2/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]