Talk:Arizona's 3rd congressional district

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger proposal[edit]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Loyd.


Republican Primary[edit]

Are candidates too lazy to even put their names on wikipedia, or are no Republicans running against Shadegg in the primary, got my ballot today. Sure Shadegg is great on border security but he's a free trader, and I don't vote for free traders.98.165.6.225 (talk) 01:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New district map[edit]

ISN'T REDISTRICTING FUN? The correct written description of district 3 on this page doesn't match the map shown. The caption on the map correctly describes it as a map 'from 2003 to 2013', but no other map is shown (such as a current map 2013-present). The correct area of district 3 is roughly the former area of district 7, though it does have some important geographic changes.

The current problem is that it's confusing to folks visiting the page, who may think that the map shown is the current area of the district.

Thank you,

AndrewSisk (talk) 23:53, 7 November 2013 (UTC) AndrewSisk andrewsisk@gmail.com[reply]

for reference:

http://grijalva.house.gov/3rd-district/

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/AZ/3

http://nationalatlas.gov/printable/printableViewer.htm?imgF=images/preview/congdist/pagecgd113_az.gif&imgW=792&imgH=612

You're totally right that this should have been done some time ago, but the issue is much bigger than this particular article. I just added an item to the WikiProject's to do list, but I'm not sure how many people are paying attention over there.
If you have the time and motivation, and either know how to add images to Wikipedia or have the time to learn, I highly encourage you to do so. I recommend the maps from the National Atlas, because maps on individual member's pages will be inconsistent and sometimes not there, and the map from govtrack appears to be copyrighted. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 02:56, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arizona's 3rd congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arizona's 3rd congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]