Talk:Arliss (TV series)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

confusion

"during the october 22 2004 of saturday night live" what happened on that show? Spencerk 03:13, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms section

This section provides only negative opinions of the show. I have seen both viewers and critics that spoke favorable of the show and I think such possitive reviews should be included. While it may be true that most viewers and critics disliked the show it was never 100% as the article now seems to imply. --Cab88 16:46, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The show wasn't the greatest but too much space has here is taken up bashing it. HBO has always courted sports watchers, and Arli$$'s long run surely has more to do with that than rumors about Wuhls' frienship with HBO execs. 1st & Ten (TV series) ran for just as long and that show was much, much worse than Arli$$. The Saturday Night Live joke should probably completely go.Static Universe 06:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's no harm in some criticism - the value here is noting that yes, critics did hate it, and yes, it didn't have many fans, but those fans cared so much about the show that they kept it on the air. I've noted this with a quote from a TIME blog and have rewritten the section. Alexfoley (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like these comments were written by poorly programmed HBO execubots or something... 24.212.155.182 (talk) 17:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arliss.JPG

Image:Arliss.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arliss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061012082221/http://www.ew.com:80/ew/article/commentary/0,6115,398606_3%7C32440%7C%7C0_0_,00.html to http://www.ew.com/ew/article/commentary/0,6115,398606_3%7C32440%7C%7C0_0_,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:07, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]