Talk:Army creole

Army creole
Army creole
Setting and usage	American Armed Forces
Era	Modern
Purpose	Army communications
Early form	American English
Dialects	Army, Navy, Air
Official status
Regulated by	United States Armed Forces
Language codes
ISO 639-3	–

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Army creole article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Infobox?

Does this have enough standing as a dialect to rate an infobox? I was thing about using this if so:

--Auric talk 21:22, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox looks good, but I'm not sure this a uniquely United States dialect. Hal Lawrence's familiarity with the dialect suggests it may be more widely associated with the military forces of English-speaking nations which have usually been allied over the last century. Can we get some input from UK and Australian military personnel? Thewellman (talk) 03:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]