Talk:Army of Sambre and Meuse

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Army of Sambre and Meuse article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Army of Sambre and Meuse is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 27, 2023.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 13, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
March 24, 2018	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
August 14, 2018	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Military history: European / French / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Who were they fighting?[edit]

This article seems a little unclear at the start about who was involved in this fighting. As a featured article, it seemed like I had to read quite a bit of the introductory paragraphs before I got any idea of who this army was fighting with. Maybe because I have only a minimal background in this history -- possibly someone more expert in this area would understand this more. But shouldn't a featured article be clear to general readers, without needing any prior expertise in the area? Just suggesting that this article might present the basic facts more directly in the opening. T bonham (talk) 00:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Baden?[edit]

@Dank: What's the problem with describing Baden that you mention in this edit? Don't know if this helps, but in the period that this article is concerned with, Baden was the Margraviate of Baden, which is probably the best term to use instead of "Duke of Baden" which currently appears in the "Politics" section. I believe that "Markgraf" was more common in German than the English counterpart "Margrave", though we did have similar territories in England, which we know as Marches. Factotem (talk) 21:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the problem was that a Duke isn't a state (to my knowledge), and it's in a list of states. But the Grand Duchy didn't begin until 1806 or later. - Dank (push to talk) 21:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. It should be the Margraviate of Baden. Factotem (talk) 21:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway ... to answer what I think is the question, I have a routine of reading a bit before I start copyediting. If I'm comfortable, I get started. Usually, I guess right, but sometimes when I get into it, I find that it's happening too often that I'm thinking "I'm not sure if this is right, and if it isn't, I'm not sure how to fix it". If that happens, I stop. Hopefully, it doesn't happen too often. - Dank (push to talk) 22:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of "the" in name?[edit]

The English representation of the name in the article seems a little unusual. While the similar "Armée de Rhin-et-Moselle" is rendered as Army of the Rhine and Moselle, "the" is not included in this article's name or text, despite the Sambre and Meuse both being rivers as with the Rhine and Moselle.

Is this difference in the translation of the two army's names common in the literature? Doing a very uneducated survey of the first few results in Google, including "the" seems reasonably common - e.g. 1 2, plus one of this article's citations - but most citations in this article are to printed texts I can't easily check. 143.159.89.123 (talk) 14:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]