Talk:Ashraf Ali Thanwi

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ashraf Ali Thanwi article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Islam: Muslim scholars Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Muslim scholars task force.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lead sentence

There has been a dispute [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] over whether to call Ashraf Ali Thanwi "a late-nineteenth and twentieth-century Sunni Muslim scholar" or "a late-nineteenth and twentieth-century Deobandi Muslim scholar" in the lead sentence.

I don't see why he couldn't be called "Deobandi" in the lead sentence, but I equally fail to see why it should be absolutely necessary to do that. As long as the lead somehow makes it clear that he belonged to this movement, it should be alright. Then again, why not immediately mention it in the first sentence and be done with it?

Any argument over whether this is notable enough to mention in the first sentence seems silly to me. That he was Deobandi certainly seems part of his general context as much as that he was Sunni (and so should be permissible per MOS:BIOFIRSTSENTENCE), but so many things are relevant to mention, and sometimes editorial decisions have to be made. The important bit is to have a lead text that is clear and concise.

But really, the article has a terrible lead. For one, the phrase "and the revival of classical Sufi thought from Indian subcontinent during the British Raj" is simple hanging there mid-sentence, effectively saying that Thanwi was the revival. Or, for example, what on earth is a mix of "Sunni orthodoxy, Islamic elements of belief and the patriarchal structure of the society", and how could one 'teach' that? What this article needs is someone with better English skills and an interest in the topic to go over it and copy-edit it throughout.

I strongly advise to put off any dispute over one word in the lead sentence until that vital copy-editing has been done. Of course other editors are free to discuss this and come to a wp:consensus (rather than edit war) about the "Deobandi"/"Sunni" issue, but I won't be participating in that. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 13:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]