Talk:Assassin's Creed (video game)/Archive 4.000000e+00

Sequel Clean-up

Now that Assassin's Creed II has its own page. I purpose to delete this section leaving on a link to its main article. Or at the very least all that should remain here is key developmental information. All plot, character or gameplay information should be posted there. TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Francisco Randez

That's what it says within the "Development" section. But, if my French is not too bad, in the citation given it is stated that he is from Montréal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.52.162.4 (talk) 20:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

My French isn't any good, but I found an English website (which I've linked as a source) saying his home town in Montréal, but that he has a Spanish background. I've corrected the details, saying that he is a model from Montréal. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 21:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

ERROR

Assassin's creed 2 redirects HERE. FIX THAT —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.28.14 (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

PLEASE DON'T SHOUT - IT'S BAD ETIQUETTE! Now that that is done with, I'll look at fixing it. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 15:21, 18 April 2009 (UT

how am I shouting your reading? extra big words are not considered shouting unless i add an exclamation point like this!! (now im "shouting") but thanks anyway!!!!

All caps usually means you are shouting in netiquette - you should really avoid it. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 21:59, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

iPhone 'prequel'

There is mention in the article of a prequel for iPhone, but it is instead a port of the DS game, (proof here: http://kotaku.com/5210803/first-look-at-assassins-creed-on-iphone) I think this needs to be changed. J4cK0fHe4rt5 (talk) 12:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Rating

The game was rated by PEGI as a 16+. Following complaints, it was re-rated as an 18+. Old boxed labelled 16+ were recalled. Not sure where / how to put this into the article. 86.132.60.78 (talk) 16:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Why?

Can anyone tell me why this article is only rated C-Class? I've seen plenty of featured articles with the same amount of citations, same format, lengths, amounts of detail, and links, yet this is isn't even an A or B class, why? Perhaps we should resubmit it for assessment? GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 07:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

The article is kind of a mess. There are several dozens of things that need references, a few things that should be rewritten, and a few things that simply don't belong. 98.71.213.217 (talk) 04:01, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Plot and Gameplay need trimming; we need to add more to Reception and Development (hopefully get another two paragraphs or more); and we need to expand the Lede. There are miscellaneous other changes that need to be made (a copyedit in particular...). We could probably uprank it to B; I've seen worse. --Izno (talk) 19:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

I disagree about the development section. I'd like to see it trimmed and tightened. Maybe change it to development and release and incorporate the limited edition section. 98.71.213.217 (talk) 10:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

You can take the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare article as an example and as base for future development of this article. That why I added a slight excerpt on the plot of the game in the lede, just check the article I just linked. My lede is not preciseley the best, but it can be polished. :P --> RUL3R^{*flaming | *vandalism} 14:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

98: Yeah, I was thinking about that change. That said, the dev section is severely lacking in actual development. There's only about one paragraph's worth of it. --Izno (talk) 15:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)